- UID
- 681353
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-10-12
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
两个小时才写完。。。T T 求猛拍!!!题目:Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country.
There is a prevailing claim that collegesand universities should require their students to go abroad as exchangestudents for at least a semester. As this requirement can promotes students'understanding in globalization and broaden their horizon technically, therestill exist some problems and obstacles that make it impossible to be realizedin present society, not only the prohibitive expense in other countries, butalso the limited education sources and various individual characteristics.
Studying in a foreign country does bringplenty of advantages, for it offers a proximate way to witness the unificationof the whole world. Being in a different country, one can benefit much from themeditating the gaps in substances and beliefs, and hence to comprehend betterfor the challenges his or her motherland is faced. In the early 20th century,China sent a lot of youths to western countries to learn the advanced scienceand progressive ideologies, and then started a revolution in this onceprosperous nation. In fact, almost each tremendous development inpostindustrial era cannot be isolated from the international communications onthe basis of youth exchanging program.
However, it is not realistic to require allcolleges and universities students to take part in international programswithout consideration on their majors, personalities and economic power. Onemay not deny that not every person can adapt well to the unfamiliarenvironment, especially when he or she are not social. Besides, the economicproblems cannot be exclude form the exchanging decision. Generally speaking,the living costs in another country are higher because of the existence ofcommuting, tutoring and house renting. For the students who cannot afford thefees, studying abroad would be really hard if no financial aids are provided bythe governments, universities and funds.
Another difficulty is the lacking resourcesof higher education .The distribution of education odds is neither equal oreven ,since the most universities counted in top 100 belong to the U.S.A andEurope, and the minute rest located in a few Asia countries. As there are not manypoints to study in a university whose rank is lower than your own school, theoptions offered are quiet less than the demand, which causes imbalance ineducation market. Every year, thousands of students apply for thirty to fortystudying chances, competing fiercely and crucially, in Harvard Business school,and many local students, whose linguistic ability and cultural involvementfulfill the requirement, cannot get the offers, not to mention the foreignstudents whose mother tongue is not English. Of course, these hot competitions notjust exist in Harvard. Facing the difficult selection ,Universities would tryits best to get the merited appliers, that is to say the redundant sources ,ifthere is any, can hardly satisfy a number of exchange students.
Accounting for the reasons above, requiringall students to study in foreign countries seems to be a excellent change toimprove youths' abilities, nonetheless, it cannot be accomplished according to diversesituations of individuals. What colleges and universities should do is try to beas open as it could, and encourage students to study abroad by offeringscholarship and aids. |
|