ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year. But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government's huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines.

Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2636|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og-61

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-7 05:54:00 | 只看该作者

og-61

61.



The recent decline in the value of the dollar was triggered by a prediction of slower economic growth in the coming year. But that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar had it not been for the government’s huge budget deficit, which must therefore be decreased to prevent future currency declines.






Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the conclusion about how to prevent future currency declines?






(A) The government has made little attempt to reduce the budget deficit.



(B) The budget deficit has not caused a slowdown in economic growth.



(C) The value of the dollar declined several times in the year prior to the recent prediction of slower economic growth.



(D) Before there was a large budget deficit, predictions of slower economic growth frequently caused declines in the dollar’s value.



(E) When there is a large budget deficit, other events in addition to predictions of slower economic growth sometimes trigger declines in currency value.


D正确


og解析为:


The argument assumes that a particular predict can cause a currency decline only if accompanied by a large budget deficit. Since choice D states that this prediction can cause a currency decline without a large budget deficit, choice D is the best answer.



题目划线部分我理解不了, 各位nn能帮帮我吗? 谢谢


沙发
发表于 2004-9-7 06:57:00 | 只看该作者
If it had  not been for the government’s huge budget deficit, that prediction would not have adversely affected the dollar  
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-7 13:54:00 | 只看该作者

恍然大悟!!   谢谢版主!!!

原来是倒装. 这种句法在gamt好像不常见啊

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-29 19:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部