ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: tony6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-8-22题,为什么B不行?

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2005-9-14 19:32:00 | 只看该作者
up
22#
发表于 2005-9-19 11:43:00 | 只看该作者

我再顶

23#
发表于 2005-9-27 17:58:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用illgetthere在2005-9-19 11:43:00的发言:

我再顶



24#
发表于 2005-10-12 00:27:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用mindfree在2004-8-23 20:02:00的发言:

Answer is D.


B does not have to be true for this question. If the painting deteriorate somewhat with the standards, the standards can still be relaxed if the relaxation does not affect the restoration. I do not know why you choose B. Pls explain.


C is not correct either. It is clearly out of scope. We are talking about restoring this particular type of painting and the standards as well as the change are both for this kind of painting. Whether the museum has other kind of items is irrelevent. Please make sure you understand.


D is one typical answer. It simply points out that it might not be the oil that requires the standard, but something else.


mindfree不是说了么,B的条件太强;即使有一点影响还是可以接受的,因为这不是省钱么(按原文的逻辑 very costly)


LOR:因为实验发现old paint不会受温度湿度影响,所以relax  the standard 不会影响old painting。问假设。
因此,C中的items that are more likely to be vulnerable to fluctuations in temperature and humidity than Renaissance oil paintings. 无关


D. None of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are...
取非 = SOME of the materials in Renaissance oil paintings other than the paint are...


既然油画上的paint不会受温度湿度影响(因为实验证明old paint如何如何),而且D说其他冬冬也不会受影响而破坏油画,这不就全了么。


25#
发表于 2005-12-3 15:34:00 | 只看该作者

首先弄清painting and paint mean different things. painting画,paint油漆



choice B:  狡猾的无关选项。 文章结构:old paint is unaffected by wide fluctuation => relaxing standards without endangering paintings.



B说:在现在的条件下,paintings do not deteriorate at all. 取非:If paintings did deteriorate a little, 只要不是使paintings endangered, relaxing standards is ok.



C. 无关。文章重点讨论如何保存oil paintings. 如果文章说的是保存oil paintings 和别的艺术品, 那么可以考虑C



D. paints以外的成分,不会因为wide fluctuation而损坏paintings. (典型ETS答案:它因不导致B).


26#
发表于 2005-12-14 19:06:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用milanforever在2005-12-3 15:34:00的发言:

首先弄清painting and paint mean different things. painting画,paint油漆






choice B:  狡猾的无关选项。 文章结构:old paint is unaffected by wide fluctuation => relaxing standards without endangering paintings.





B说:在现在的条件下,paintings do not deteriorate at all. 取非:If paintings did deteriorate a little, 只要不是使paintings endangered, relaxing standards is ok.





C. 无关。文章重点讨论如何保存oil paintings. 如果文章说的是保存oil paintings 和别的艺术品, 那么可以考虑C





D. paints以外的成分,不会因为wide fluctuation而损坏paintings. (典型ETS答案:它因不导致B).





首先弄清painting and paint mean different things. painting画,paint油漆

哦开始就把文章中的油漆看成油画了。em12  


所以肯定是d   油漆可以不用恒温恒湿, 不能得出油画也可以, 如果油画包含其他怕改变的温湿的成分, 也不行的

27#
发表于 2006-6-14 13:51:00 | 只看该作者

mindfree, lawyer_1看他们的解释,真能让人豁然开朗。

就像当年读Linux的源程序

28#
发表于 2007-10-3 21:23:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用milanforever在2005-12-3 15:34:00的发言:

首先弄清painting and paint mean different things. painting画,paint油漆

choice B:  狡猾的无关选项。
            
文章结构:old paint is unaffected by wide fluctuation => relaxing standards without endangering paintings.

B说:在现在的条件下,paintings do not deteriorate at all. 取非:If paintings did deteriorate a little, 只要不是使paintings endangered, relaxing standards is ok.

C. 无关。文章重点讨论如何保存oil paintings. 如果文章说的是保存oil paintings 和别的艺术品, 那么可以考虑C

D. paints以外的成分,不会因为wide fluctuation而损坏paintings. (典型ETS答案:它因不导致B).

这个解释太关键了!!!

其实我就是开始根本没分清paint和painting,才做错的!

谢谢!

29#
发表于 2007-10-3 21:35:00 | 只看该作者

我个人对“不选B”的理由的补充:

将B取非:在现有条件下,painting已经deteriorate了。

可是这又能如何呢?

没有提到,降低条件后,这种deterioration会加剧啊!!!

所以,即使已经deteriorate了,还是可以降低条件啊,反正不会进一步deteriorate了。

----

各位以为如何?

原文说了,即使是old oil paint 也不会受较大的温度湿度变化的影响,所以我这个deterioration不会加重的解释也是行得通的吧?


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-10-3 21:36:23编辑过]
30#
发表于 2007-10-3 23:53:00 | 只看该作者
B肯定不对,现在的条件下不deteriorate不代表降低标准以后不会dereriorate
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-30 10:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部