蓝皮书上的一道逻辑题，求解答

xiaoyu612

22. In 1992, a major newspaper circulatedthroughout North American paid its reporters an average salary paid by itsprinciple competitors to their reporters. An executive of the newspaper arguedthat this practice was justified, since any shortfall that might exist in thereporters’ salaries is fully compensated by the valuable training they receivethrough their assignments.

Which one of the following, if true aboutthe newspaper in 1992, most seriously undermines the justification offered bythe executive?

A.    Senior reporters at the newspaper earned as much as reporters ofsimilar stature who worked for the newspaper’s principle competitors.
B.    Most of the newspaper’s reporters had worked there for more than tenyears.
C.    The circulation of the newspaper had recently reached a plateau, afterit had increased steadily throughout the 1980s.
D.    The union that represented reporters at the newspaper was differentfrom the union that represented reporters at the newspaper’s competitors.
E.     The newspaper was widely read throughout continental Europe and Great Britain as well as North America.

参考答案：B

wildmantomba

参考一下
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-23562-1-1.html

In 1992, a major newspaper circulated throughout North American paid its reporters an average salary paid by its principle competitors to their reporters（BACKGROUND）. An executive of the newspaper argued that this practice was justified（Conclusion）,since any shortfall that might exist in the reporters' salaries is fully compensated by the valuable training they receive through their assignments（Premise）.

前提：有价值的培训可补偿薪资的不足
结论：这样的薪资基准是合乎情理的

问题：weaken管理者所提出的合理性（即有价值的培训可补偿薪资的不足）

A）资深记者的薪水与主要竞争对手中处于相对位置的记者的薪水相当（没有提出与论点相关的信息）
B）报社中大部分的记者的工龄已达十年（提出了指派的任务是否仍能提供有价值的培训的疑问）
C）报社的发行量（无关）
D）工会组织（无关）
E）阅读群众的区域性（无关）

xiaoyu612

还是搞不懂，工龄跟培训与工薪有什么关系呀

xiaoyu612

还是搞不懂，工龄跟培训与工薪有什么关系呀