ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: Suri在奋斗
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[梦之队日记] 暂时停止更新~suri的gmat之旅,加油加油~~~~

[复制链接]
131#
发表于 2012-2-1 18:32:14 | 只看该作者
re啊~~suri的力作要不咱就唤做 "bible of the bible"

准备看你的BIBLE总结啦~我时间不够了~SURI总结的太amazing了!
-- by 会员 miss绿光 (2012/2/1 16:54:19)



我看了几个版本的总结把那些总结的很精辟的话再放上去,这样更有利于理清脉络,感觉清晰度比我第一次看bible好,那一次可能是bible真的太厚了还要上课就没坚持看下去啦,嘿嘿~~bat和daisy的总结很好,我在他们基础上加了些自己看到的点然后再看了其他nn总结的~~绿光这样说,俺很开心哦~~
-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/2/1 17:09:13)

132#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-1 19:03:13 | 只看该作者
Chapter 10 Method of Reasoning & Flaw in the Reasoning Question(**做到Method and Flaw 题目是高分的表现)

1.Method of Reasoning questions
Method of Reasoning questions require you to select the answer choice that best describes the method used by the author to make the argument. Structurally, Method of Reasoning questions are simply abstract Must Be True questions: instead of identifying the facts of the argument, you must identify the logic organization of the argument.

2.As part of the first family of questions
(1)you can use only the imformation in the stimulus to prove the correct answer choice
(2)Any answer choice that describles an element or a situation that does not occur in the stimulus is incorrect
1)只能用原文当中出现的信息去确认正确选项
2)任何出现在原文中未提到的元素的选项都是错的


3.Question stem features
The method of the argument is to
The argument proceeds by
The argument derives its conclusion by
Which of the following describes the technique of reasoning
Which of the following is an argumentative strategy employed in this argument

4.Flaw in the Reasoning questions
Flaw in the Reasoning questions are exactly the same as Method of Reasoning questions with the important exception that the question stem indicates that the reasoning stem indicates that the reasoning in the stimulus is flawed.

To indentify the right answer choice, carefully consider the reasoning used in the stimulus. The correct answer will identify the error in the author’s reasoning and then describe that error in general terms. Beware of answers that describe a portion of the stimulus but fail to identify the error in the reasoning.

5.Flaw in The Reasoning Question/Method of Reasoning Question 解法

(1)Prehasing in Method& Flaw Questions  预判整个题干中的logical organization
When prephasing in Method and Flaw questions, you may understand the details of the stimulus but not understand the structure of the argument. Thus, each answer may sound implausible since they are related primarily to the logical construction of the argument. Therefore, you must think about the structure of the argument before examining the answer choices.
(2)TheFact Test in Method& Flaw QuestionsFact Test: If an answer choice describes an event that did not occur in the stimulus, then the answer is incorrect.
The test maker will try to entice you by creating incorrect answer choices that contain elements that did not occur, and you must avoid those answers and select the answer choice that describes what occurred in the stimulus.
Watch out for answers that are partially true—that is, answers that contain a description of something that happened in the argument but that also contain additional things that did not occur.
Method and Flaw难在表达抽象。在看选项之前,要先对原文的推理结构有一个大致概念。然后分别检查每个选项是否符合此概念。检查的唯一方法是到原文中找相应内容。如果原文中找不到相对应之处,则排除。


6.Incorrect Answers in Method and Flaw Questions
”New” Element Answers
Because correct Method of Reasoning answers must be based on elements of the stimulus, an answer that describes something that did not occur or describes an element new to the argument cannot be correct. All of the wrong answer choices described below are simply very specific variations on the theme.
Half right, Half wrong Answers
The rule for these answers is that half wrong equals all wrong.
Exaggerated Answers
Exaggerated Answers state a situation from the stimulus and stretch that situation to make an extreme statement that is not supported by the stimulus. Be careful, though! Just because an answer choice contains extreme language does not mean that the answer is incorrect.

The Opposite Answer
The Reversed Answer


7.Method of Reasoning- Bolded Argument Part Questions
(1)  In method-AP questions,the question stem cites a specific portion or portions of the stimulus and then asks you to identify the role the cited portion plays in the structure of the argument or about the role the two portions play in relation to each other
(2)The answers in each problem then describe the structural role of the citation,ofen using terms you are already familiar with such as "premise” “assumption”and "conclusion"

(3)The stimuli that accompany Method-AP Questions tend to be more complex than the average GMAT stimulus. Some problems feature two conclusions (one is the main conclusion, the other is a subsidiary conclusion), and often the stimulus includes two different viewpoints or the use of counter-premises. Thus, the ability to identify argument parts using indicator words is important.

(4)A Common Wrong Answer
One tricky used by the test makers in Method-AP questions is to create wrong answers that describe parts of the argument other than the part named in the question stem. These answers are particularly attractive because they do describe a part of the argument, just not the part referenced in the question stem. Before proceeding the answer choices, make sure you know exactly what parts of the argument you are being asked about.


lawyer

METHOD OF REASONING(包括ROLE)
看原文:找出原文的推理结构
找答案:用排除法。排除出现原文没说过的东西的选项,包括新元素极端化夸张的元素相反的元素颠倒的元素。结合TEST
TEST:选项描述了原文的结构,每个元素都必须在原文出现过
ROLE(bold face):分析原文的结构即某句话在原文的作用,和答案对。原文结构元素包括前提(premise),反前提(counter premise),附加前提(additional premise),副结论(sub-conclution),主结论(conclution)。对于两个结论的段子,很多主结论在第一句话副结论(SUBSIDARY, SECONDATY,INTERMEDIATE,SUPPORTING CONCLUSION)在结尾并有指示词

FLAW IN THE REASONING
看原文:找出原文错误
找答案:描述原文错误的为答案。描述的因素原文没有的为错误答案
TEST:描述原文的推理错误,每个元素都必须在原文出现过。
133#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-1 19:07:25 | 只看该作者
re啊~~suri的力作要不咱就唤做 "bible of the bible"

准备看你的BIBLE总结啦~我时间不够了~SURI总结的太amazing了!
-- by 会员 miss绿光 (2012/2/1 16:54:19)




我看了几个版本的总结把那些总结的很精辟的话再放上去,这样更有利于理清脉络,感觉清晰度比我第一次看bible好,那一次可能是bible真的太厚了还要上课就没坚持看下去啦,嘿嘿~~bat和daisy的总结很好,我在他们基础上加了些自己看到的点然后再看了其他nn总结的~~绿光这样说,俺很开心哦~~
-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/2/1 17:09:13)


-- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/2/1 18:32:14)

不敢啦~~~只是把nn们总结过的再梳理一点~~呵呵,baby姐姐绿光这样看好,俺很是光荣呀~~!!
134#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-1 19:10:25 | 只看该作者
准备看你的BIBLE总结啦~我时间不够了~SURI总结的太amazing了!
-- by 会员 miss绿光 (2012/2/1 16:54:19)




我看了几个版本的总结把那些总结的很精辟的话再放上去,这样更有利于理清脉络,感觉清晰度比我第一次看bible好,那一次可能是bible真的太厚了还要上课就没坚持看下去啦,嘿嘿~~bat和daisy的总结很好,我在他们基础上加了些自己看到的点然后再看了其他nn总结的~~绿光这样说,俺很开心哦~~
-- by 会员 Suri在奋斗 (2012/2/1 17:09:13)



嗯~~~学习学习~~~~suri很厉害哇~~!!
-- by 会员 泾渭不凡 (2012/2/1 18:13:39)

俺没有那么厉害,cr还处于木有开窍阶段,我想还是多总结多做题,有时候时间紧可能这些条条方法在考试是想不到更多的是感觉~~嘿嘿~~饭饭加油哇~~
135#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-2 00:07:30 | 只看该作者
总结og的时候看到哪个类型的题目,有哪些小点,对照着笔记的话,发现逻辑虽然考阅读也考一种思维能力,要培养一种感觉,就如og说哪个选项无关,但并没说为什么,记得某个nn说看og的过程就是让你对这些无关的选项有了感觉,培养日后做题看到一个题你能第一直觉发现无关一样。
136#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-2 00:15:27 | 只看该作者
我的效率还是有待提高~~~总结几道语法睡觉去~~
137#
发表于 2012-2-2 00:31:14 | 只看该作者
晚安suri~决定看你的bible了!
138#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-2 00:35:33 | 只看该作者
晚安suri~决定看你的bible了!
-- by 会员 泾渭不凡 (2012/2/2 0:31:14)

嘿嘿~~~good nite~~饭饭
139#
发表于 2012-2-2 00:44:31 | 只看该作者
加油,呵呵!
140#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-2-2 01:13:53 | 只看该作者
加油,呵呵!
-- by 会员 phoebe0624 (2012/2/2 0:44:31)

共加油~~~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-22 00:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部