ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: babypace
打印 上一主题 下一主题

babypace暂别G

[精华] [复制链接]
751#
发表于 2005-9-7 23:36:00 | 只看该作者
功力不够先不做GWD了
752#
发表于 2005-9-8 00:03:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用babypace在2005-9-7 13:17:00的发言:

第10套就是GWD24, XY 没有改动过,所以自己down了做就行了。


我是看了逻辑讨论贴的。由于和讨论的意见不一致,所以才贴到这里看看大家如何看待我的思路的。


我觉得这几题被如此争论的原因在于,大家对论点的不一致。如果知道了论点,也就是题目要support或者weaken的到底是什么,就不会有那么多的争论了。我觉得29, 30 是C,A。


至于第9, 特别体现了大家如何看待题目要论证的东西的。论证的是被SV 10污染的疫苗是导致病人有病毒的原因,而不是接触猴子导致的。所以我还是认为9选E。



明白了,呵呵,多谢!


呵呵,第9题是E啊,好像没什么争论了.


第29题, 我觉得A的意思是S大学和其他大学对于从潜在的捐款人那里得到的捐款(注意这里不是说金额,是说人数)是一样的,也就是说S大学不比其他大学更成功, 总的80%比别人高是因为以前捐过的人又捐了,所以这部分跟他们的contact无关,所以说The high success rate shows insufficient canvassing effort.


不知道说明白了没有,发现现在中文水平越来越差了

753#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-8 00:43:00 | 只看该作者

GWD  12-19


Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.





  1. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
  2. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.

  3. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.
  4. Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.

  5. Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

这题C还是E?我选了E。


29题的逻辑是A呀,对的,我同意你的说法,所以A是支持。

754#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-8 01:20:00 | 只看该作者

GWD12-31:


Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.




  1. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering


  2. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber


  3. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering


  4. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering


  5. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

A还是E?

755#
发表于 2005-9-8 04:00:00 | 只看该作者

GWD12-19


争论在C,E。我选E。C中的it的距离足以导致它的错误。同样类似的指代错误在gwd里出现很多次,例如which 引导的定语从句和被修饰词的距离过远。og中好像有关于对远距离空袭式指代的驳斥。C的另一个明显不妥的是miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear,而原句是miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear。当然gwd中有的题正确选项对原文进行了改写,但是那些改写不足以改变句意。而且,如果选项中有不改写的选项,而且也没语法错误,为什么不选呢?比如E,


E的插入部分是同位语。Being不是错,因为逻辑主语很明显。且Being heavily committed to a course of action整个是主语。E没有语法错误,逻辑正确,所以正确。

756#
发表于 2005-9-8 04:11:00 | 只看该作者

GWD12-31


A和E的语法都没错,关键看句子要表示的意思。当我前n次看到这道题时,我觉得是A对。原因1,我第一次做就选A。原因2,分词伴随修饰我觉得很酷。但是,当我第n+1次看到这道题的时候,我感觉彻悟后选E。为啥?把句子读上10遍就有感觉了。说不出来。



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-9-8 4:21:22编辑过]
757#
发表于 2005-9-8 10:03:00 | 只看该作者
不好意思baby,最近封闭培训,好久没上网了。看到你这里讨论的热火朝天,恭喜恭喜哦。
758#
发表于 2005-9-8 10:18:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用babypace在2005-9-8 1:20:00的发言:

GWD12-31:



Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.







  1. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering


  2. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber


  3. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886and outnumbering


  4. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering


  5. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

A还是E?



E,E的逻辑意思好


大家讨论

759#
发表于 2005-9-8 10:28:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用babypace在2005-9-8 0:43:00的发言:

GWD  12-19


Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.





  1. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

  2. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.

  3. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.

  4. Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.

  5. Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

这题C还是E?我选了E。


我选C,把自己以前的发言帖出来



A、heavy commitment by sb. to sth.:awkward;miss和misinterpret没有逻辑主语;miss sth. or misinterpret sth. when they do appear,when从句修饰对象不清,修饰misinterpret或miss or misinterpret。



B、one优先指代an executive;make sth. doing sth. or doing sth. likely,unidiomatic,注:前面有人说过make sth. adj.是正确的结构,我承认,但这里missing signs和misinterpreting ones是动宾结构,而非名词性短语,因而不能当作sth.处理,所以错;ones不如them;和A一样的歧义。



C、正确。it的指代问题:首先,it不可能指代an executive,因为是人;其次,a course of action和signs都是宾语,同一级别,而incipient trouble是signs的补充说明(个人认为是补语,不确定),级别比前两者低,因此it优先指代a course of action。除此之外,miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear结构没有A那样的歧义。



D、them不可指代executives;和A一样的歧义。



E、being ... is likely to make sb. do结构不好,没有指出being的逻辑主语;和A一样的歧义。




大家讨论


baby可能看过了吧?

760#
发表于 2005-9-8 10:32:00 | 只看该作者
发现在计划帖里讨论比较有效果,题目的专帖里提问经常没人理
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-15 02:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部