GWD-6-21

bigdog1220

I also chose B.

B states that those employees have high productivity because they are"most productive employees" (from 1st sentence), not because their workschedule "but all were assigned to it by their supervisors".

请牛牛指点!

rings

我也B,C似乎是加强,题目问的是削弱啊,NN指教

bigdog1220

up!

bigdog1220

顶!

lawyer_1

选C

C提出这些职工多产的原因是每天有2个小时工作没受同事干扰。如果PRESIDENT的计划实行，这个多产的原因（没受同事干扰）就消失，PRESIDENT实行计划的目的（提高效率）就受挫。所以WEAKEN。

B说那些多产的职工是被迫的，但事实是他们产量高，他们被迫也好，自愿也好，也改变不了这个现实，反正他们产量最高。所以对PRESIDENT的计划起不了WEAKEN作用。

G_KEVIN

赞同lawyer的观点，两者之间有本质的不同或者本质的相似，在由M推广到N的时候，如果M不具备，或者N具备而M无法具备某个条件的时候，往往构成削弱；

leemike0928

D,Who can tell me?  D is worong?

shihyenn

Up, I still don't know why D is wrong.

It seems that employee were compensated based on their productivity not on their working hour. So they won't be effected by any kind of schedule. Thus, the president's plan may not work.

Any one please help.

mindfree

B is not correct, even though it looks like. If we understand the reasoning, we will know that it does not matter whether they willing work that schedule or not, as the problem leaves you no logic reasoning to think that way. for example, if you forced to eat more, you still get fat even though you do not volunteer.

D is not correct either. D casts no doubt as to whether the same schedule will work to the company's favor by improving the productivity. I do not see the link between. Pls explain.

C is correct. It simply states that the high productivity is due to the fact that these already productive people can work undisturbed by co-workers. So one thing is that if everyone works the same schedule, people will be disturbed. Second, these people are already productive, as suggested by the problem.

Maggiewjy

b肯定不对，因为即使那些高效的员工是被强制实行该制度，但是他们的效率的确是提高的了。这样起不到削弱plan的作用啊～～～Plan－－使所有员工都实行该四天工作制能提高效率。 C中提出那些高效的员工之所以高效是因为他们每天除了和别人一样的8小时工作时间（这期间是要被打扰的）以外，还有两小时不被打扰的时间独自工作。因此效率才高。所以如果所有的人都按照四天工作制就和五天工作制一样，并且无法提高效率。。。