精炼-------------------1‘02“-----------------------------weaken
B: The pacific turtles feed near the B. hatch in japanese waters.
P: Loggerhead turtles live and breed in different groups.
C: 95% of DNA samples collected from B turtles match those turtles from the Japanese nesting sites.
Prephrase: Loggerhead turtles' DNA does not match the those turtles from the japanese nesting sites.(实在想不出来用什么weaken了)
Analysis:
(A) Nesting sites of loggerhead turtles have been found the Pacific coast of North America Several thousand kilometers north of the Baja peninsula.
----------pacific这个地方的turtles和B这个地方离的多远属于无关选项。
(B) The distance between nesting sites and feeding sites of Atlantic loggerhead turtles is less than 5,000 kilometers.
----------the distance between these two sites is irrelevant.
(C) Loggerhead hatchlings in Japanese waters have been declining in number for the last decade while the number of nesting sites near the Baja peninsula has remained constant.
----------turtles from japanese waters下降,而靠近B的这个地方的turtles却是一样的数量,并不能证明DNA的变化。
(D) Ninety-five percent of the DNA samples taken from the Baja turtles match those taken from Atlantic loggerhead turtles.
----------证明95% of the DNA samples和Atlantic turtles也是一样的。虽然对了,但是逻辑关系搞错了~~~囧`
(E) Commercial aquariums have been successfully breeding Atlantic loggerheads with Pacific loggerheads for the last five years.
----------irrelevant
题目一上来最难找的就是conclusion。
Loggerhead turtles live and breed in distinct groups, of which some are in the Pacific Ocean and some are in the Atlantic.
(明显定位为背景信息)New evidence suggests that juvenile Pacific loggerheads that feed near the Baja Peninsula hatch in Japanese waters 10,000 kilometers away.(这句话竟然是conclusion,我上来看到了evidence就定位了premise)Ninety-five percent of the DNA samples taken from the Baja turtles match those taken from turtles at the Japanese nesting sites.(这句话才是premise,好混乱的说~~~)
谁能给解释一下为什么new evidence suggests是conclusion?怎么推出来的?
-- by 会员 fox0923 (2011/11/28 3:35:19)
fox~~~其中我多么想跟你说下我的想法~无奈在我写了50分钟过后,我发现我想表达的东西是混乱的~啊~~~抓狂~~~
接下来的东西你将就看一下吧~我感觉都要被我自己绕进去了~今天脑袋已经完全不转了~哎哎~
推理:Baja turtles 95%的DNA样本与日本nesting sites里面turtles的DNA相符合~
所以:(在Baja附近feed的)年幼的Pacific loggerheads在10000公里远的日本海域孵化。
因为二者DNA样本高度相似——所以推断Pacific loggerheads跑到日本海域去下蛋了。
反过来:如果因为Pacific loggerheads跑到日本海域去下蛋——怎么能够推出Baja turtle和日本nesting sites里面turtle的DNA样本95%相似呢?难道就因为去下了个蛋,然后就DNA高度相似啦?
举个不恰当的例子哈:一个A1跑到美国去生孩子了,当然不能推出结论A1在中国生的娃与在美国生的娃DNA高度相似。(爹都可能不一样呢~)
如果说知道一个A1在中国的生的娃与在美国的生的娃DNA
高度相似,那么我们可以合理推测其实是A1跑到美国去生娃了~
答案的意思就是可能是A2跑到美国去生娃了(A1和A2是亲姐妹,DNA高度相似)(好猥琐的例子。。。捂脸飘走了。。。)
我感觉不能用一个陈述的事实去推断一个含有统计性意义的结论。
我越发的凌乱的~其实就说自己想的到~说不清楚~哎哎~你将就看一下~说说你的想法嘛~再讨论哈~
-- by 会员 风无衣 (2011/11/28 22:21:24)
风无衣总结的已经很好了,其实我就是应该用这种推理方法把premise-conclusion联起来看来测试谁是conclusion,谢谢你啊,虽然例子有点搞笑,不过清楚易懂就是目的拉,不畏缩拉~~