ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2085|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教费费第45题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-26 23:37:00 | 只看该作者

请教费费第45题

45. Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.


This reasoning in the commissioner’s argument is flawed because this argument


(A) relies on information that is far from certain


(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution


(C) inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts


(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague


(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds


看到这些选项,觉得无从下手,有事么技法吗?(答案是b)


沙发
发表于 2004-7-27 12:16:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得关键你要把文章的推理看懂,

事实:也可以理解为原因:Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year.

原因:1)Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures

2)The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year

结论:approve the plan

推理: decrease expenditures->this plan can cuts the cost ->approve the plan

正确的逻辑应是:this plan can cuts the cost ->decrease expenditures故B正确

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-13 01:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部