ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 5495|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全-13-5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-7-25 23:33:00 | 只看该作者

大全-13-5

5.     Financing for a large construction project was provided by a group of banks. When the money was gone before the project was completed, the banks approved additional loans. Now, with funds used up again and completion still not at hand, the banks refuse to extend further loans, although without those loans, the project is doomed.


Which of the following, if true, best explains why the bank’s current reaction is different from their reaction in the previous instance of depletion of funds?



(A) The banks have reassessed the income potential of the completed project and have concluded that total income generable would be less than total interest due on the old plus the needed new loans.


(B) The banks have identified several other projects that offer faster repayment of the principal if loans are approved now to get those projects started.


(C) The banks had agreed with the borrowers that the construction loans would be secured by the completed project.无关


(D) The cost overruns were largely due to unforeseeable problems that arose in the most difficult phase of the construction work.说原因,无关(A


(E) The project stimulated the development and refinement of several new construction techniques, which will make it easier and cheaper to carry out similar projects in the future.讲后来的结果,无关,另:无关比较点


这题花时1分54秒,在A和B中选,最后选了B。


A对 B是不是也可以啊


谢谢


沙发
发表于 2004-7-26 04:16:00 | 只看该作者
The question is asking why the bank's two reactions are different.  A is relevant but B is not much so.  
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-7-28 11:55:00 | 只看该作者

按B说的


现在发现新的更快收回贷款的项目 所以撤资了


是不是也说得通啊


能再讲讲吗


谢谢

地板
发表于 2005-9-10 00:10:00 | 只看该作者
顶一下,我也是这个问题。谢谢!
5#
发表于 2005-12-1 15:23:00 | 只看该作者

说银行在其它项目上投资并不一定要撤回对现有项目的追加投资吧。


不过我对A也有疑惑:A说因为银行重新评估后发现项目竣工后的收入比银行的贷款利息低所以就停止了追加投资,但是如果现在A停止投资,项目就不能complete,那以前的钱不就白投了吗,损失企不是更大?


又钻牛角尖了。。。

6#
发表于 2006-8-14 06:23:00 | 只看该作者
我有和楼上相同的问题,希望xdjm们帮忙。另外想请教,这个题的解题思路是怎么样的?自己做时思路有点乱
7#
发表于 2006-12-14 12:47:00 | 只看该作者

  估计楼上也看不到了

  在作决策时,是要考虑沉没成本,即一旦成本投出去,就不能因为这个成本的未来损益情况影响了以后的决策。

  所以我们只考虑现在还未投出的资金能不能带来收益就行。

  譬如:我以前花一万买了个电脑,但是现在基本过时了,升级的话需要花三千,在买个新的也就五千,这个时候做决策就不能考虑以前的一万会不会浪费了,而要考虑这个三千和这个五千哪一个带来的相对好处要大。

8#
发表于 2006-12-30 13:18:00 | 只看该作者

You cannot make money from the investment if the cash flow is negative.

If  total income generable < total interest due on the old plus the needed new loans, then your cash flow will be negative all the time.

So A is correct.


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-12-30 13:18:59编辑过]
9#
发表于 2007-1-28 19:07:00 | 只看该作者
我怎么觉的这题应该选B呀
A是有道理, 但没钱, 那工程就要完了, 银行贷出去的钱就肉包子打狗了.
B则能使资金回流.
10#
发表于 2007-7-24 13:31:00 | 只看该作者
A中说明的情况是此项目必为亏损项目,即银行不盈利
B中说the faster repayment of the principal 其他项目的本金还得快不快与银行能否从那些项目中盈利无关,因为银行盈利在于向借款者收取利息
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-30 07:52
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部