Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
- Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
- An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.
- An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.
- Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.
- Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
说一下我的解题步骤:
A、heavy commitment by sb. to sth.:awkward;miss和misinterpret没有逻辑主语;miss sth. or misinterpret sth. when they do appear,when从句修饰对象不清,修饰misinterpret或miss or misinterpret。
B、one优先指代an executive;make sth. doing sth. or doing sth. likely,unidiomatic,注:前面有人说过make sth. adj.是正确的结构,我承认,但这里missing signs和misinterpreting ones是动宾结构,而非名词性短语,因而不能当作sth.处理,所以错;ones不如them;和A一样的歧义。
C、正确。it的指代问题:首先,it不可能指代an executive,因为是人;其次,a course of action和signs都是宾语,同一级别,而incipient trouble是signs的补充说明(个人认为是补语,不确定),级别比前两者低,因此it优先指代a course of action。除此之外,miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear结构没有A那样的歧义。
D、them不可指代executives;和A一样的歧义。
E、being ... is likely to make sb. do结构不好,没有指出being的逻辑主语;和A一样的歧义。
大家讨论 |