阅读主旨题

Zerousa

总说阅读的主旨题有套路是，有一定的表述方法，大家认为是什么啊？

半阙

上XDF课黄深老师总结的很详细，是按各个不同类型的文章总结的，个人认为虽然有道理，但基本上主题题错就是因为类型判断的不准确，不知道文章到底在讲啥~所以按文章类型去总结意义也不大。我把黄深老师说的小小总结了下：
   主旨题：一般类型的文章，抓各段首句，以及首段转折句
               论点说明型及评述型文章主旨在首段，通常为首段首句或末句。
     注意几点：态度不能错（这个偶废话啦~）、强调点不能错（比如说新老观点的题，肯定是要强调新观点去批判老观点的）、不能片面（比如某个选项只概括了文章某一段的内容，那肯定错），细节不能出现在主题题中。
      暂时只想起来这么多了，其实主旨题知道了文章在讲啥就一般不会错了，当然，也有些题选项很接近比较纠结，这个要LZ慢慢去领会啦~~~

ashcroft

main idea我还是经常错。。。
借帖子问一题～～
阅读大全79，第一题：
1.    The passage is primarily concerned
(A) demonstrating why the methods of early seismologists were flawed
(B) arguing that deep events are poorly understood and deserve further study
(C) defending a revolutionary theory about the causes of earthquakes and methods of predicting them
(D) discussing evidence for the existence of deep events and the conditions that allow them to occur
(E) comparing the effects of shallow events with those of deep events

答案为啥是c。。。文章第一段：
In most earthquakes the Earth’s crust cracks like porcelain. Stress builds up until a fracture forms at a depth of a few kilometers and the crust slips to relieve the stress. Some earthquakes, however, take place hundreds of kilometers down in the Earth’s mantle, where high pressure makes rock so ductile that it flows instead of cracking, even under stress severe enough to deform it like putty. How can there be earthquakes at such depths?
最后一句：How can there be earthquakes at such depths? 我认为明显是一个问题解释型的文章，不是新旧观点的对比，后面通篇都在解释这个deep earthquake是怎么去发现，怎么去解释的，哪里有defend a thoery的意思，而且c选项中“ and methods of predicting them”，我觉得文中也没有这个method～～