GWD-9-16

summersmile

我明白lawyer的解释，但是题目

A diet high in saturated fats increases a person’s risk of developing heart disease. Regular consumption of red wine reduces that risk. Per-capita consumption of saturated fats is currently about the same in France as in the United States, but there is less heart disease there than in the United States because consumption of red wine is higher in France. The difference in regular red-wine consumption has been narrowing, but no similar convergence in heart-disease rates has occurred.

而B中over the past 30 years,包含在： Per-capita consumption of saturated fats is currently about the same in France as in the United States,所以B应该与原文一致，不起任何作用。而不是起反作用。

我的理解对马？nn指教！

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-7 3:13:00编辑过]

msfox

楼上有理，比较的时间区间不同。B可以说是无关。

skyalan

唉，这个题我后面部分也没怎么看懂，看这E像正确答案就选了，希望这种好运气能延续到机考

tqbiao

哎 还是阅读问题呀，俺再看一边题目，就觉得推理清楚地不得了亚！第一编被那个convergence 搞的大脑短路

ethyl

A：无关推理

B：无关；或者与原文不一致

C：太笼统

D：无关

E：很tricky的选项，从另一个方面得出结论；逆向思维，有一点

channing76

The difference in regular red-wine consumption has been narrowing, but no similar convergence in heart-disease rates has occurred但现在两个国家的（人均）红酒消费量的差异已经比较小了，但心脏病发生率方面的差异却没有同样减少

第一次没读懂意思

channing76

解释题只要有点直接能自圆起说即可，大可不必推导那没麻烦。

Colin33

以下是引用bloodcherry在2004-9-21 4:20:00的发言：

看错了，原来是法国低,做题的时候看成M国低了,review的时候居然还是看成M国低

谢谢斑竹的解释..

俺也选了B, 俺也看成M国低拉. 考逻辑就是考短篇阅读

lindazhou

B+条件：而由于心脏病通常在中年才显现，所以法国的心脏病发病率在短期内也没有增加，这样，两个国家之间心脏病发病率的差距并没有减少。也是同理呀， 为什么不对

lindazhou

ding