ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: superbat28
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[备考心经] 酒壹肆-BAT二战GMAT 750~迟到的心经[2011-09]

[精华]   [复制链接]
841#
发表于 2014-4-7 13:38:24 | 只看该作者
superbat28 发表于 2011-9-16 10:28
二、CR(重新更正版~我觉得第一次那个太次~愿这次帮到大家)今早想了想,决定重新写一下这个部分。看到后面 ...

0000000000000000
842#
发表于 2014-4-9 16:52:32 | 只看该作者
好棒!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
843#
发表于 2014-4-11 15:26:06 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼主分享,马克一记~
844#
发表于 2014-4-27 14:22:43 | 只看该作者
Bat大神,我看了你的帖子觉得非常有帮助,不过我对于辨识【因果型】和【非因果型】仍然有困难。看到你在page2里说过【因果型】是解释了前提的感觉。但仍然有些疑惑。
以下这题,我感觉它是【非因果型】的,你觉得呢?

The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 residents) in Meadowbrook is 60 percent higher now than it was four years ago. The corresponding increase for Parkdale is only 10 percent. These figures support the conclusion that residents of Meadowbrook are more likely to become victims of violent crime than are residents of Parkdale.

The argument above is flawed because it fails to take into account
A  changes in the population density of both Parkdale and Meadowbrook over the past four years  分析A选项
B  how the rate of population growth in Meadowbrook over the past four years compares to the corresponding rate for Parkdale
C  the ratio of violent to nonviolent crimes committed during the past four years in Meadowbrook and Parkdale  
D  the violent crime rates in Meadowbrook and Parkdale four years ago  
E  how Meadowbrook's expenditures for crime prevention over the past four years compare to Parkdale's expenditures
盼望解答^^谢谢
845#
发表于 2014-4-28 00:01:52 | 只看该作者
写的很棒
846#
发表于 2014-4-28 12:46:51 | 只看该作者
楼主太吊了!!!!!!!!
847#
发表于 2014-4-30 08:31:55 | 只看该作者
顶楼主!
848#
发表于 2014-5-3 05:37:19 | 只看该作者
太感谢楼主!!
849#
发表于 2014-5-10 20:08:40 | 只看该作者
重读了bat的心经 很有收获 谢谢
850#
发表于 2014-6-7 01:28:44 | 只看该作者
可否问一下密码是什么呢?刚看到大神的经验分享。谢谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-18 00:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部