ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.

Which of the following challenges indicates the most serious weakness in the attempted explanation described above?

正确答案: A

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3015|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求解OG63题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-8-21 14:31:02 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
63.    When hypnotized subjects are told that they are deaf and are then asked whether they can hear the hypnotist, they reply, "No." Some theorists try to explain this result by arguing that the selves of hypnotized subjects are dissociated into separate parts, and that the part that is deaf is dissociated from the part that replies.
Which of the following challenges indicates the most
serious weakness in the attempted explanation
described above?
(A)    Why does the part that replies not answer, "Yes"?
(B)    Why are the observed facts in need of any
special explanation?
(C)    Why do the subjects appear to accept the
hypnotist's suggestion that they are deaf?
(D)    Why do hypnotized subjects all respond the
same way in the situation described?
(E)    Why are the separate parts of the self the same
for all subjects?

NN能否帮忙分析一下这道题,感激不尽啊!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-8-24 15:54:22 | 只看该作者
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-570658-1-1.html
板凳
发表于 2011-8-24 20:09:22 | 只看该作者
问他是不是聋了 他说no 那就矛盾了 于是解释说其实是两个部分 一个是聋的 一个是说话 那问题出现了 既然分为两部分 那就说明那部分不聋 那为嘛不说yes
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-3 23:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部