跪求答案！ Prep 老版 P2 的第17題！

Kclaire

At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables.  However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities.  Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables.  Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.

The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that

(A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available
(B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals
(C) a customer of the Hollywood who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
(D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
(E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables

也肯能是我自己理解的不對
但是問題是問的下面哪個是weaken原來觀點的
可是C明明就是support....還是我看題看錯了...vulnerable to critisim 到底是麻？

AlohaDJ

http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_CR/thread-565901-1-1.html#15252793

除了link里这个帖子，论坛里之前还有不少这道题的讨论帖，lz可以搜来瞧瞧~~

Kclaire

謝謝~