【每日逻辑链练习贴】【逻辑1-8】

daisyの小夢想

来对答案~~：
1.
看漏了题目的结论: Automobile theft has been reduced by the program

2.
50. Although computers can enhance people’s ability to communicate, computer games are a cause of underdeveloped communication skills in children. After-school hours spent playing computer games are hours not spent talking with people. Therefore, children who spend all their spare time playing these games have less experience in interpersonal communication than other children have.
The argument depends on which of the following assumptions?
(C) Children who do not spend all of their after-school hours playing computer games spend at least some of that time talking with other people.
第二题觉得和OG这题很像，就用了这题的思路。
但答案不一样。因为OG里强调的是After-school hours spent playing computer games are hours not spent talking with people. 狒狒这题没有强调这点。
只要排除other factors就是assumption。

3.
狒狒逻辑解释：
In my view, the reasoning in this argument is that:
nature will continually adjust the carbon level a sustained increase in the level of carbon would not threaten human life.
The statement of E points out that even the nature will continually adjust the carbon level, wide fluctuations in the carbon level in the short term will exert the remarkable negative to the human life.(Common sense tells us that the life of human is often less than 100 years)
So, E is the correct chose.
貌似这里的point不是nature能不能continually adjust the carbon level，而是人类能不能承受这个level。

4.
Sales of higher-priced houses were unaffected by the sales drop because their purchasers have fewer constraints limiting the total amount they pay.
就是说那些购买者不介意价钱？？

superbat28

明早再看~mark下，反正你明早肯定比我起得早~哈。。明天中文前帮daisy看看哈~我先去歇着> <

superbat28

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bat: 关于evaluation的题目，如果我没有题目就想不出来要怎么表达，虽然我知道evaluation主要是weaken conclusion的，但是怎样用更贴近答案的形式在看选项前在脑中有一个大概的印象？我只能用链接谁引导谁来推出答案。你是怎么做的？

-- by 会员 fox0923 (2011/8/14 14:50:40)

呃。。话说我没有看懂你的话><
而且，我不觉得是在weaken conclusion诶，我总觉得削弱的时候，和削弱题是一个感觉。。
open to discuss~
且等fox在非夜间时段的表达~哈哈

-- by 会员 superbat28 (2011/8/14 20:19:44)

半夜不睡觉搞逻辑，难道语言都表达不清了？还是到这边来太久了，english没学会chinese也忘了？
我是说evaluation的题目好像都是可以用否定或是肯定的答题方式来看是否可以strengthen/weaken 原题来做的。
哎哎啊，简单点吧：你是怎么想到“any other methods"的？和答案这么吻合?就是你做这类题没看答案以前脑子是怎样出现这个答案的？

btw,我现在时差颠倒，分不清“白夜还是黑昼”了~~

-- by 会员 fox0923 (2011/8/15 0:38:52)

啊啊！我才看到。。。画圈认错.....
好像这种题型应该是一类吧~不确定，很久没看了。题型如下：
给出一个fact，由这个fact得出一个结论，这个结论是用来解释这个fact。（最后这句很重要！）
削弱方法：1. 一般都是有它因（就是不可能是去攻击premise，从而来weaken conclusion, 原因我自认为是“fact无法被攻击”【此处的fact还不同于research，research, observtation可以被攻击，而fact有效性是不能被攻击的额。。】）
2. 给出有因无果的例子（这个GWD里老见。。GWD的恶心地方就在于，好多题不是去攻击premise,而是举例子！而那堆例子还都是【有因无果】的具体化例子，得仔细读明白了，还得能有反应。。）

加强方法：1. 排除它因出现的可能         2. 强化有因有果，无因无果（一般也是例子）

evaluation：那就是上面二者结合了~~~~~

open to discuss~~~~

superbat28

3.
狒狒逻辑解释：
In my view, the reasoning in this argument is that:
nature will continually adjust the carbon level a sustained increase in the level of carbon would not threaten human life.
The statement of E points out that even the nature will continually adjust the carbon level, wide fluctuations in the carbon level in the short term will exert the remarkable negative to the human life.(Common sense tells us that the life of human is often less than 100 years)
So, E is the correct chose.
貌似这里的point不是nature能不能continually adjust the carbon level，而是人类能不能承受这个level。

4.
Sales of higher-priced houses were unaffected by the sales drop because their purchasers have fewer constraints limiting the total amount they pay.
就是说那些购买者不介意价钱？？

-- by 会员 daisyの小夢想 (2011/8/15 23:05:17)

第三题，同意diasy~原来我一直看错了关注点。。。那既然它的concern应该是人类能不能sustain，恩。。那就应该是如daisy所说~

第四题，大意就是他们不关注钱。其实可以这么理解：“好多人不买房，是因为他们想看贷款利率能降到什么程度”，“但是，房价却升了”
原因在于“那些买的起高价房的人仍在买房（因为他们是现款买房）- -”

fox0923

to bat：看得似懂非懂，好象大概意思明白了，不过还得结合真题做几道，GWD还没开始做CR，不了解具体题型。明天拿出来两道看看，再回归bat的方法。。

纳丁Cat

8-13
1. 30s
In a new police program, automobile owners in some neighborhoods whose cars are not normally driven between 1 A.M. and 5 A.M. can display a special decal in the cars’ windows and authorize police to stop the cars during those hours to check the drivers’ licenses. The theft rate for cars bearing such decals is much lower than had been usual for cars in those neighborhoods.
If it is concluded from the statements above that automobile theft has been reduced by the program, which one of the following would be most important to answer in evaluating that conclusion?
Decal贴花纸
一个国家出了一个新规定，说晚间1点到3点，警察要检查来往的车子。结论：发现偷车的几率比隔壁国家小多了。
在一个新的规定中，一些车主如果在晚间1点到5点不常出去的话，可以贴一个花纸在玻璃上，然后警察就会在晚上检查这些车。结论：这个方法能降低盗车率。
评价：贴上的花纸能不能撕下来。
A: Are owners who are cautious enough to join the program taking other special measures to protect their cars against theft? 他因涉入。

2.30s
The more television children watch, the less competent they are in mathematical knowledge. More than a third of children in the United States watch television for more than five hours a day; in South Korea the figure is only 7 percent. But whereas less than 15 percent of children in the United States understand advanced measurement and geometric concepts, 40 percent of South Korean children are competent in these areas. Therefore, if United States children are to do well in mathematics, they must watch less television.
Which one of the following is an assumption upon in advanced measurement and geometric concepts than are South Korean children?
说看多少电视和数学能力有关系。在美国每天看5小时电视的娃娃比韩国多。而他们的数学能力也比韩国娃娃差。结论：如果要提高美国娃娃的数学能力，他们要少看电视。
假设：韩国娃娃没看电视的时间是在做与提高数学有关的事。
A: The instruction in advanced measurement and geometric concepts available to children in the United States is not substantially worse than that available to South 排除干扰。
Instruction指导，教导

3.55s
Nature constantly adjusts the atmospheric carbon level. An increase in the level causes the atmosphere to hold more heat, which causes more water to evaporate from the oceans, which causes increased rain. Rain washes some carbon from the air into the oceans, where it eventually becomes part of the seabed. A decrease in atmosphere carbon causes decreased evaporation from the oceans, which cause less rain, and thus less carbon is washed into the oceans. Yet some environmentalists worry that burning fossil fuels may raise atmospheric carbon to a dangerous level. It is true that a sustained increase would threaten human life. But the environmentalists should relax---nature will continually adjust the carbon level.
Which one of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument in the passage?
自然能自己调节碳在大气中的含量。首先要吸收海洋中的水，升空，形成雨，下雨，雨把碳又冲进海里，形成河床。环境学家说，大气中碳含量对人有害。结论：但是这个担心是木有必要的。因为自然自己能够调节。
削弱：自己的自我调节是由限度的。目前人们烧东西已经严重超过这个量的。
标答：The natural adjustment process, which occurs over millions of years, allow wide fluctuations in the carbon level in the short term
说实话，我现在觉得这个答案不是很好。不过在原题里，这个答案应该算是最相关的。它的着眼点是"over past millions of years"，以此说明“那个时候没有人存在”，从而说明人类这么干会有影响。但是，我能想到的方法还是去说明"Nature cannot withstand such fluctuation."
Nadine：我觉得答案的重点在in the short term这个点上，原文a sustained increase would threaten human life. 这个就反驳了a sustained increase，自然只能短期。线索一致。

4. 35s
In January there was a large drop in the number of new houses sold, because interest rates for mortgages were falling and many consumers were waiting to see how low the rates would go. This large sales drop was accompanied by a sharp rise in the average price of new houses sold.
Which of the following, if true, best explains the sharp rise in the average price of new houses?
一月份卖的房子下降了。因为贷房利息下降了，很多人持观望态度看它能下降好多。而另一种房的销售量却上升了。而新房的平均卖价却上升了。
解释：这个时候买新房的人好多不需要房贷，而且买的是很贵的房子。
标答: Sales of higher-priced houses were unaffected by the sales drop because their purchasers have fewer constraints limiting the total amount they pay. 他因涉入

夏雨霏霏

第3题，会不会是削弱continually 呢。因为E说调节机制允许短期大幅波动.

大三准备留学

1.在一个社区中 一个政策要求车主很少在凌晨1点到5点出车的将会在车窗上做上一个标志，如果交警在这个时间段看到这个车在路上，将会拦下并且检查驾驶员的驾驶证，这样可以减少汽车的被偷窃程度

评估：检查驾驶证能否检测出是否是小偷？

2.孩子们少看电视会加强他们数学理解能力，美国的孩子比韩国的孩子多看电视，韩国的孩子在理解数学难题上胜于美国孩子，所以想提高数学能力，孩子们应该少接触电视

假设：除了电视以外，美国孩子和韩国孩子的其他不同不会影响他们的数学能力，比如先天基因不同。

3.超时了。。。就是说自然会自动净化空气中的含碳量。。。一连串的因果。。
  所以专家们不用担心过多的汽车尾气排放会使得空气中的含碳量过高而导致人们受害

削弱：超过一定量的含碳量  自然也无法完全的净化掉

4. 新房子的交易量大幅度的下跌，这个下跌是因为最近的接待利率在下跌，人们在观察它到底能跌倒什么程度，但是新房子的价格却不断上涨

这是为什么捏？ 我想不到。。。

5.。。。。1.因为每一年的情况不一样 去年的证明不代表适应当今的环境
         2.我们已经有了code不代表它的完全完善
         3.最后一句话赤裸裸的看不懂

CC5

1.在一个新的项目中,要求车主在他们不会用车的1:00到5:00给贴个条在车的窗户上,以让警方辨认.后来,这个地方的偷车率降低
假设:这个地方小偷偷车的时间主要集中在1~5点
 
2.pre:more children watch TV in USA than in SK, and children in SK are do better in math than in USA .
 Con: the more TV children watch , the less competent they are in math knowledge
 Ass: children watch more TV would waste more time that should spend on study.

3.(1min06s我这题目太绕了…)
Pre: nature adjusts carbon level
Con: so, it’s no use to worry about that fossil fuel will lead carbon level to a high level.
Weak: it’s possible that carbon level becomes a high level that nature can’t adjust.

4.22s
pre:the interest rate decreased and many people wait to see the rate would go, so that they wouldn’t draw their money from bank.
Con: the price of new house sold will rise
Explain: people will find it’s more useful to spend money buying a house than hold it in the bank

MiaZhang

1.50s【超时鸟~~~第一遍竟然没看懂！】
P=Program：凌晨1点到5点，非正常行驶的车辆会在窗户上留下一个decal，这样警察就会跟过来，并检查driver's license
C：有了这种decal的车，theft rate跟原来相比减少了
GAP——同时发生不等于因果关系！
Evaluation：有这种decal的车是不是原来经常被偷的车？
2.28s
P:美国孩子看电视比韩国孩子看电视时间长，韩国孩子数学成绩比美国孩子数学成绩好
C:美国孩子要提高数学成绩，就应该少看电视
Assumption：在两国之间，不存在影响孩子数学成绩的其他因素不一样的情况
3.44s【好险~~其实前面啰哩啰嗦的adjust部分不用看那么认真昂。。。】
BG：大自然对大气中的碳有自我调节机制，这个机制balabalabalabala...
P:虽然持续增加的碳会威胁人们健康，但是自然中有这个调节机制
C:人们不用担心化石燃料的燃烧会影响人们的生活
【因果性结论——削弱：找他因，资料有问题，因果倒置，隔断因果】
Weaken：这个机制的调节能力有限【有因无果】
4.28s
P:一月份新房销量下降，因为人们发现利率下降，所以在等待利率达到最低值
C:将会有一个sharp increase in sales of the average price
Explain:利率降的很低后，人们会纷纷贷款买房，demand增加，price增加（怎么觉得像是在分析经济现象。。。无聊一下：警惕凯恩斯陷阱！= =）
5.42s
P:我们有一个ethic code
首先，这个code有公司agreed to follow;其次，这个code是去年签署的，所以它于现在的经济环境密切相关；第三，。。。（没看懂，求教！）
C:不需要ethic regulation或则ethic enforcement
AA-Weaken：
实地全等~去年和今年可能环境有变化
Agree to follow不等于一定会follow