【每日逻辑链练习贴】【逻辑1-3】

daisyの小夢想

哇你们瞬间把明天的都做了~~亚历山大。。。。T T

-- by 会员 抓抓sandra (2011/8/10 0:18:40)

        妳晕了 哈哈 这是昨天的嘛~~

fox0923

42“
Premise: spacecraft is too heavy to take people to the space and return.
Conclusion: The spacecraft can be refilled by extra device for people to return easily.
Assumption: The weight of the extra device is enough light for the spacecraft to carry with.

24"
Premise: A lot cases of cavities do not cause serious problems if left them untreated.
Conclusion: The dentist shouldn't treat the cavity of tooth if it's not dangerous.
Strengthen: The research is based on the accurate information of representative samples of patients.

35”
Premise: The twins have the same personality, but two individuals were born in different areas 40years ago have different personalities.
Conclusion: So the horoscope can't determine the personality.
Assumption: The horoscope cannot be the only factor for determine human's personalities.

45"(后来又读了一遍）
Premise: It is not important that any of candidates win the election, since the two parties support their preferable candidates by throwing money in.
Conclusion: These two parties are very premature.
Strengthen： Two parties sponsor the medias with a lot money to allure people's attention in order to get their candidates win.(感觉好像和原来的premise重复了，想不出来了，你们都帮我看看，这样的strengthen行吗？）

52"
Premise: Two experiments show the different results of children's behavior when they watch different videos.
Conclusion: Children would like to imitate violent action when watch male video more than they do when watch female video.
Weaken: 1. The children in these two groups are different.
              2. The children who like to imitate the violent action are tested to have disease of anxiety and depression.

superbat28

42“
Premise: spacecraft is too heavy to take people to the space and return.
Conclusion: The spacecraft can be refilled by extra device for people to return easily.
Assumption: The weight of the extra device is enough light for the spacecraft to carry with.

24"
Premise: A lot cases of cavities do not cause serious problems if left them untreated.
Conclusion: The dentist shouldn't treat the cavity of tooth if it's not dangerous.
Strengthen: The research is based on the accurate information of representative samples of patients.

35”
Premise: The twins have the same personality, but two individuals were born in different areas 40years ago have different personalities.
Conclusion: So the horoscope can't determine the personality.
Assumption: The horoscope cannot be the only factor for determine human's personalities.

45"(后来又读了一遍）
Premise: It is not important that any of candidates win the election, since the two parties support their preferable candidates by throwing money in.
Conclusion: These two parties are very premature.
Strengthen： Two parties sponsor the medias with a lot money to allure people's attention in order to get their candidates win.(感觉好像和原来的premise重复了，想不出来了，你们都帮我看看，这样的strengthen行吗？）

52"
Premise: Two experiments show the different results of children's behavior when they watch different videos.
Conclusion: Children would like to imitate violent action when watch male video more than they do when watch female video.
Weaken: 1. The children in these two groups are different.
              2. The children who like to imitate the violent action are tested to have disease of anxiety and depression.

-- by 会员 fox0923 (2011/8/10 11:40:18)

我牺牲了吃午饭的时间前来援救啊T T
恩。。第三题貌似fox读错题了吧，结论好像反了的说 = =

第四题啊。。第四题我觉得你也读错了T T
容我拿母语说吧，说完热饭吃去T T
我突然觉得这道题和OG那道修路题很像啊。

那道题是：那些指责我们国家道路condition不好的指责是错误的，因为我们每年都拿很多钱去修路。
它当时的weaken是：只有道路不好的国家，才拿一堆钱修路的。（潜在就是说：拿一堆钱修路就是为了弥补你道路状况不好。）

那第四题：说这两个政党失去power的指责是错误的，因为他们去年都拿出了更多的钱去资助他们的候选人。
那strenthen就是：拿更多的钱去资助候选人布什为了弥补政党失去power的呗~

我感觉是这样！~~~~

fox0923

Bat: I reviewed the problem number 3 again, is the conclusion supposed to be "the horoscope can determine the personality is wrong?" That's what I had there, then which part that you mentioned I understood wrong?

You are right for the problem 4,i missed the term of last sentence-the end. I read it again, thanks lah.

I have to type in english, no chinese type version in my cell phone. Geee.....

superbat28

Bat: I reviewed the problem number 3 again, is the conclusion supposed to be "the horoscope can determine the personality is wrong?" That's what I had there, then which part that you mentioned I understood wrong?

You are right for the problem 4,i missed the term of last sentence-the end. I read it again, thanks lah.

I have to type in english, no chinese type version in my cell phone. Geee.....

-- by 会员 fox0923 (2011/8/11 4:07:02)

hoho~
I reply in English~ lalala~
骗你的。。英文发现不会表达，中文吧。。
就是第一次结论你错了啊~它的结论是horoscope cannot determine the personality，不是第一次你说的horoscope is not the only factor that determine the personality。貌似二者还是有差别的吧>< （貌似我现在觉得差别不是特大。。但是，还是觉得第二个不像是特别specific的结论）

fox0923

终于回到我可爱的家了，可以打中文了，原来你说的是我的assumption，那我了解了，这个assumption我当时也觉得有些不舒服，不过想了想觉得horoscope is not the only factor to determine the personality表达的是还有其他的原因是决定personality的，所以单凭horoscope itself不能成立。不过我也了解这不是个很理由的理由，看了你们的有了些启发。
谢谢哈~

fox0923

hoho~
I reply in English~ lalala~
骗你的。。英文发现不会表达，中文吧。。
就是第一次结论你错了啊~它的结论是horoscope cannot determine the personality，不是第一次你说的horoscope is not the only factor that determine the personality。貌似二者还是有差别的吧>< （貌似我现在觉得差别不是特大。。但是，还是觉得第二个不像是特别specific的结论）                                    

bat以后要多多挑我的错误啊，最近才刚开始系统复习CR，发觉有很多理解上的问题，尤其是题目的细节理解，感觉有时premise差一点点没注意就会选错答案。今天看了一下午CR，刚刚有点起色。。。

balapupu

恩，第四题Bat说得有道理～～！

superbat28

hoho~
I reply in English~ lalala~
骗你的。。英文发现不会表达，中文吧。。
就是第一次结论你错了啊~它的结论是horoscope cannot determine the personality，不是第一次你说的horoscope is not the only factor that determine the personality。貌似二者还是有差别的吧>< （貌似我现在觉得差别不是特大。。但是，还是觉得第二个不像是特别specific的结论）                                    

bat以后要多多挑我的错误啊，最近才刚开始系统复习CR，发觉有很多理解上的问题，尤其是题目的细节理解，感觉有时premise差一点点没注意就会选错答案。今天看了一下午CR，刚刚有点起色。。。

-- by 会员 fox0923 (2011/8/11 9:14:01)

我CR也在努力中啊，共勉共勉~
我的原则就是，谨慎读题！！！~~

daisyの小夢想

3. 46s 被那个horoscope打败了，不认识这个词啊T T
Con: we cannot say horoscope determines our personalities
Premise: The same time they are born, one in T one in NYC, but they do not have same personalities

Assumption: The other factors are all the same for these two people.

-- by 会员 superbat28 (2011/8/9 22:11:57)

但bat的assumption也不对，
为horoscope是星座，那么作者就认为the same time they are born等于他们有相同的星座了。
反驳是即使他们同一天出生，但不同地点，他们的性格还是不同。这里的gap是他们的出生日期--->horoscope。
所以bala的assumption对，“占星仅仅和时间有关系。”
回到bat说的，无论the other factors是不是the same都没有影响，因为是星座决定了性格，除非the other factors也是影响星座的属性。
-----
家里楼上装修很嘈哇，气死了，上来溜达溜达~~