个人认为: ETS违背出题原则的一道题，大N帮忙理下

ruiyangchai

Journalist:Inphysicsjournals,thenumberofarticlesreportingtheresultsofexperimentsinvolvingparticle
acceleratorswaslowerlastyearthanithadbeeninpreviousyears.Severaloftheparticleacceleratorsatmajor
researchinstitutionswereoutofservicetheyearbeforelastforrepairs,soitislikelythatthelownumberof
articleswasduetothedeclineinavailabilityofparticleaccelerators.

Whichofthefollowing,iftrue,mostseriouslyunderminesthejournalist'sargument?

(A)Everyarticlebasedonexperimentswithparticleacceleratorsthatwassubmittedforpublicationlastyear
actuallywaspublished.

(B)Theaveragetimescientistsmustwaitforaccesstoaparticleacceleratorhasdeclinedoverthelast
severalyears.

(C)Thenumberofphysicsjournalswasthesamelastyearasinpreviousyears.

(D)Particleacceleratorscanbeusedformorethanonegroupofexperimentsinanygivenyear.

(E)Recentchangesintheeditorialpoliciesofseveralphysicsjournalshavedecreasedthelikelihoodthat
articlesconcerningparticle-acceleratorresearchwillbeacceptedforpublication.

D. E.两项不但跟结论有关，而且紧扣premise，且D直接驳斥结论。

为何为E

P。S。有大牛说，D的漏洞在于不是研究了就一定能发表，所以解释了low number of articles.

               但是在实战中到底怎么判断conclusion中的最致命的驳斥点呢？