ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: sdcar2010
打印 上一主题 下一主题

SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】(八)Assumptions

[精华] [复制链接]
151#
发表于 2012-6-13 15:31:26 | 只看该作者
6. Newspaper editorial:
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher. Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses. However, this action is clearly counter to the governor’s ultimate goal, since after being released form prison,
inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B. Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C. The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D. Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate’s subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E. The governor’s ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.



原来的结论是,参加课程犯罪率低,现在不参加课程犯罪率高。


C项取非,参加课程的人更倾向不犯罪,这个和参加课程与否没有关系,所以在现在没有课程参加的情况下,犯罪率还是低的。

A选项取非,不能参加课程可能过吓唬住人不犯罪,现在不能参加课程,人就可能不犯罪,所以犯罪可能下降。

我还是不知道A项错在哪里了?
152#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-6-13 20:14:57 | 只看该作者
likely does not equal must
153#
发表于 2012-7-13 00:00:57 | 只看该作者
看了一半了 加油
154#
发表于 2012-10-21 23:16:48 | 只看该作者
anybody help!
第2题还是不明白嘞。。。
main conclusion是 immune system能够protect against mental illness和physical illness。
我选的是b,因为argument没有提及关于physical illness的任何信息,那么如果negate b选项的话,即mental illness和physical illness是不一样的话,原结论不就错了吗?
我的思维经常异于常人的说,还请哪位指点迷津啊!
155#
发表于 2012-10-21 23:22:37 | 只看该作者
ps.:第6题终于终于终于搞懂了==
156#
发表于 2012-10-22 22:51:50 | 只看该作者
marvelous!大赞!!!
157#
发表于 2013-3-25 21:21:04 | 只看该作者
mark之~~~~~
158#
发表于 2013-5-29 16:41:43 | 只看该作者
this post is damn great
159#
发表于 2013-6-23 19:46:34 | 只看该作者
sdcar2010真强大,mua~

sdcar楼主,您码了好多字!想请问您,大致是不是两种情况:(1)考察充分性,答案是补充gap;(2)考察必要性,答案取非削弱结论。

如中文来解释:
充分条件:如果有事物情况A,则必有事物情况B。
必要条件:如果没有事物情况A,则必然没有事物情况B。
初步分析,充分和必要都是以B为结论,考察充分性答案补充的是A到B之间的gap,考察必要性答案是取非A以至于B结论无法实现。
以上,纸上谈兵了。

么么哒sdcar2010,求确认。

Thanks in advance.
160#
发表于 2013-11-21 10:04:00 | 只看该作者
超有用!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-27 13:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部