额。。。怎么发了两遍？
请教sdcar, #2 A中Johnson is right in criticizing 这是是正确还是错误，是对应这原文的Johnson is on firm ground 么？？A选项是否仅仅equally（因为原文没说程度）一个错误？
是正确
是对应这原文
是因equally
另外，我把#4分析了一下，NN请看分析的对么？Recently, environmentalists have argued that the government should stop adding fluoride to our water supply（background）. I think this is wrong.（conclusion） I support adding fluoride to our water supply for the same reason I support adding iodine to common table salt. I admit that the addition of iodine to table salt has proven benefits and is far less controversial than the addition of fluoride to the water supply.（premise）Still（转折？）, I wonder if the same environmentalists who argue against fluoride would argue against iodine.（concession？）
Recently, environmentalists have argued that the government should stop adding fluoride to our water supply（opposing opinion）. I think this is wrong.（conclusion） I support adding fluoride to our water supply for the same reason I support adding iodine to common table salt. (premise) I admit that the addition of iodine to table salt has proven benefits and is far less controversial than the addition of fluoride to the water supply.（concession）Still（转折）, I wonder if the same environmentalists who argue against fluoride would argue against iodine.（premise）
You got the main conclusion right and that is the key for main point questions. Good work. The rest assignments of functions are helpful but are not critical, at least for this question.
-- by 会员 UlysessHope (2011/10/23 16:48:05)
| 
[复制链接]
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
楼主
发表于 2011-10-24 22:37:03
