For CR passages, focus on premise and main conclusion.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/8/18 9:46:05)
Hi sdcar2010 I've got a question with (2） is the flaw of (E) attributing Johnson to Dickson's Editors, so irrelevant?
-- by 会员 terry9115 (2011/8/25 15:37:58)
No. Johnson is one of the editors to Dickson's work. The problem with E is that it's too broad. Johnson was partially right by pointing out errors made by others.
You got all the answers correct except 2). Nice work.
Johnson is on firm ground when he asserts that the early editors of Dickinson’s poetry often distorted her intentions. YetJohnson’s own, more faithful, text is still guilty of its own forms of distortion. To standardize Dickinson‘s often indecipherable handwritten punctuation by the use of the dash is to render permanent a casual mode of poetic phrasing that Dickinson surely never expected to see in print. It implies that Dickinson chose the dash as her typical mark of punctuation when, in fact, she apparently never made any definitive choice at all.
mark 请教sdcar, #2 A中Johnson is right in criticizing 这是是正确还是错误，是对应这原文的Johnson is on firm ground 么？？A选项是否仅仅equally（因为原文没说程度）一个错误？我把#4分析了一下，NN请看分析的对么？Recently, environmentalists have argued that the government should stop adding fluoride to our water supply（background）. I think this is wrong.（conclusion） I support adding fluoride to our water supply for the same reason I support adding iodine to common table salt. I admit that the addition of iodine to table salt has proven benefits and is far less controversial than the addition of fluoride to the water supply.（premise）Still（转折？）, I wonder if the same environmentalists who argue against fluoride would argue against iodine.（concession？）
请教sdcar, #2 A中Johnson is right in criticizing 这是是正确还是错误，是对应这原文的Johnson is on firm ground 么？？A选项是否仅仅equally（因为原文没说程度）一个错误？
另外，我把#4分析了一下，NN请看分析的对么？Recently, environmentalists have argued that the government should stop adding fluoride to our water supply（background）. I think this is wrong.（conclusion） I support adding fluoride to our water supply for the same reason I support adding iodine to common table salt. I admit that the addition of iodine to table salt has proven benefits and is far less controversial than the addition of fluoride to the water supply.（premise）Still（转折？）, I wonder if the same environmentalists who argue against fluoride would argue against iodine.（concession？）
[复制链接]
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2011-8-25 15:37:58
楼主
