【第一期阅读小分队（已结束）】【每日阅读练习贴——速度+越障】【一楼汇总】（另附CD首发花儿阅读教材PDF）

裤裤melo · 发表于 2011-7-15 22:37:40

我来也~~~~~~~~~~~·每天必须坚持。。。 1-4 1行 65s 2行 75s 3行 80s 53s 55s 看了一下和抓抓还是有很大的差距~感觉是每天读第一篇的时候会慢一些，慢慢慢慢就快点~~~坚持啊坚持~~~~ 越障讲的是act 1.不关心他人可能导致。。。 是group而不是personal depression的原因，eg 如果care，problem就不会有了 这时候science提出了framework ea控制不好就会limit evidence证明了ea和problem的关系 2.act出场！ 说act和accept，以及act的value，eg act和rule behavior，eg act和stim的不同，act减少control，stim是做反映，eg 3.act的两个研究：1.好处以及一些运用 2，药物上的减少   act可以对自己运用 loving stance 越障感觉还是有困难~不过今天这篇难度要低一些~~~ 加油啦~~~

MarsTOF · 发表于 2011-7-15 22:39:27

1--7 速度 1--4   60以内 5  差一行   越障尼玛的手贱stop 点成了reset  时间没记住。。。 算了反正读过了。。。

fox0923 · 发表于 2011-7-15 22:45:28

[速度2-9] Clammy Change Clammy Change Will global warming make the planet more humid, too? By Brian Palmer

osted Tuesday, July 12, 2011, at 6:01 PM ET 计时1（235 words） <a href="http://mediagallery.usatoday.com/Heat+wave+broils+Midwest+and+Southern+states/G2479" target="_blank">Hot, muggy weather</a> created dangerous conditions for residents of the South and Midwest on Tuesday, and there were <a href="http://www.kansascity.com/2011/07/11/3007377/two-more-possible-heat-deaths.html" target="_blank">reports</a> of <a href="http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/illinois/article_d70e5182-abb8-11e0-903c-001a4bcf6878.html" target="_blank">heat-related deaths</a>. We all know that it's impossible to link any particular heat wave to the phenomenon of global warming, but those of us suffering in humid areas have to be wondering—is the Earth getting wetter, too? Most climatologists think so. The planet's total humidity seems likely to rise in the coming years. But there's a difference between that figure—which represents the mass of all the water vapor in the air—and the planet's relative humidity, which describes how close the air is, on average, to its saturation point at a given temperature. Total humidity is the more important metric for the planet, because water vapor is itself a greenhouse gas. Relative humidity, on the other hand, is more closely associated with human comfort, because it affects your ability to cool off by sweating. Few scientists profess to know with certainty what's going to happen to either measure over the next few decades or centuries. There's <a href="http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/pubs/thesis/2007-willett/1INTRO.pdf" target="_blank">very little global data</a> (PDF) on the issue, and those that do exist are in dispute. The majority view appears to be that relative humidity will remain more or less stable,and most climate change models are based on this assumption. If relative humidity holds constant while the temperature rises, there will be an increase in absolute humidity. 计时2 (235 words) In recent years, a few well-known scientists have rejected the assumption of stable relative humidity, however, and we're now in the middle of a dust-up in the field. On one side, there is evidence that relative humidity can <a href="http://www.eike-klima-energie.eu/uploads/media/Paltridge_01.pdf" target="_blank">change significantly</a> (PDF) over time, particularly at higher altitudes. There's even some indication that it has <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/03/05/negative-feedback-in-climate-empirical-or-emotional/" target="_blank">declined</a> over the last half-century. On the other, scientists point to data that absolute humidity at ground level <a href="http://www.cru.uea.ac.uk/cru/pubs/thesis/2007-willett/6INTRO.pdf" target="_blank">rose by about 2.2 percent</a> (PDF) overall between 1973 and 2003. The increases were particularly significant in the tropics and the northern hemisphere. (Some parts of the globe <a href="http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcruh/" target="_blank">dried out</a> over that period, too.) It's possible for both sides to be correct. If relative humidity declines modestly, significant increases in temperature would still lead to a rise in absolute humidity. This isn't just a dispute over how sweaty your grandchildren are going to be. Absolute humidity levels have a powerful effect on temperature projections. If scientists are wrong about humidity, they could have the temperature projections wrong as well. Water vapor can create a feedback loop that accelerates the effects of other greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane. As the climate warms, the air soaks up more moisture. The moisture then prevents heat from radiating through the atmosphere and into space, which warms the air further, enabling it to hold still more water. Most climate change models take this cycle into account. How Does the Heat Index Work?

retty well, if you're 5-feet-7. By Daniel Engber

osted Wednesday, July 27, 2005, at 6:39 PM ET 计时3 (245 words) Hot, humid air led to heat-index readings of 100 and above across <a href="http://www.nj.com/weather-guy/index.ssf/2011/06/newark_breaks_record_heat_inde.html" target="_blank">many</a><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/08/us-weather-heat-idUSTRE75765220110608" target="_blank">parts</a> of the country last week. What exactly is the heat index, and how does it work? Daniel Engber's 2005 "Explainer" on the topic is reprinted below. Feelin' hot, hot, hot!A national heat wave is expected to reach its <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/weather/climate/2005-07-26-heat-usat_x.htm?POE=NEWISVA" target="_blank">peak</a> today, as temperatures along the East Coast rise into the 90s and 100s. To make things worse, the high humidity has produced <a href="http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/news/050722/hot.shtml" target="_blank">heat</a><a href="http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=14920250&BRD=1697&amp

AG=461&dept_id=44551&rfi=6" target="_blank">indexes</a> of between 110 and 120. What's the "heat index," and how does it work? The heat index tells you how hot it feels at a given humidity. Moist air feels hotter than dry air because it makes sweating less efficient. On a hot, dry day, your sweat will evaporate quickly and cool your skin; under humid conditions, sweat evaporates more slowly and doesn't do as much. Just as the <a href="http://www.msc.ec.gc.ca/education/windchill/science_equations_e.cfm" target="_blank">wind chill</a> attempts to measure how cold it feels under certain wind conditions, the heat index tries to measure how hot it feels given the humidity. The formula for heat index is based on work completed in the late 1970s. R. G. Steadman wrote a paper called "The assessment of sultriness," in which he used a list of <a href="http://64.233.161.104/search?q=cache:e-wtKhBhdn8J:www.srh.noaa.gov/ffc/html/studies/ta_htindx.PDF+&hl=en&client=firefox-a" target="_blank">20 factors</a> to compute how hot you might feel on a given day. These factors included the rate at which you sweat, the type of clothes you're wearing, the surface area of your body, and what you happen to be doing. 计时4 (288 words) To isolate the effects of temperature and humidity on the perception of heat, Steadman invented a typical situation: A person who's 5 feet 7 inches and weighs 147 pounds walks at about 3.1 miles per hour in a light breeze, wearing long pants and a short-sleeved shirt. Then Steadman filled out his 20 variables with information from this scenario and figured out how hot his fictional person would feel at different outside temperatures and levels of humidity. He put the results in a table: Higher humidity would make his exemplar feel hotter, while drier conditions would make him feel cooler than it really is. For any given temperature, there is a percent humidity at which the weather "feels" exactly as hot as the thermometer indicates. <div style="text-align:center;"><div style="text-align:center;"></div> </div> Meteorologists with the National Weather Service used Steadman's table to derive a simpler <a href="http://www.srh.noaa.gov/bmx/tables/hindex.html" target="_blank">formula</a> for heat index by creating a function that approximates its values (to within 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit) using only two variables—temperature and percent humidity. Since the formula incorporates all of Steadman's assumptions, how hot you feel may differ from the heat index reported on the evening news. For example, weather reports say that today's heat index in <a href="http://www.weather.com/weather/local/10025?from=hrly_topnav_undeclared" target="_blank">New York City</a> is 106, and that the wind is blowing at 11 miles per hour. But the formula for heat index assumes that the wind is blowing at only 5.8 miles per hour—so the added breeze might make it feel cooler than what's been reported. (Unless it were really hot out—when it gets up into the high 90s, the wind <a href="http://www.zunis.org/at_least_theres_a_breeze.htm" target="_blank">actually makes you hotter</a>.) Likewise, the further your dimensions are from 5 feet 7 inches and 147 pounds, the less likely you are to feel like it's 106 degrees. <a href="http://www.wired.com/reviews/2011/06/mizuno-wave-prophecy/%20" target="_blank">Mizuno’s Foamless Running Shoes Stiffen Your Step</a> <ul>Mizuno USA Wave Prophecy <a href="http://www.wired.com/reviews/category/sports-and-outdoors/" target="_blank">Sports and Outdoors</a> · $200 · <a href="http://www.mizunousa.com/" target="_blank">Mizuno USA</a> </ul>Reviewed by <a href="http://www.wired.com/reviews/author/bbrown028/" target="_blank">Billy Brown</a>  June 29, 2011 计时5 (295 words) While most shoe companies are chasing the minimalist craze and <a href="http://www.wired.com/reviews/2011/04/minimal-shoes/?pid=870&viewall=true" target="_blank">removing the bottoms</a> of their shoes, Mizuno is going against the trend by doing away with the middle. There’s a big hole right where the cushioning should be on <a href="http://www.mizunousa.com/running/feature/mizuno-wave-prophecy-running-shoes" target="_blank">Mizuno’s Wave Prophecy</a> road shoe. In lieu of the usual <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethylene-vinyl_acetate" target="_blank">EVA foam</a> midsole — usually the first part of running shoes to break down — Mizuno has substituted the Wave Infinity Plate, a system of the company’s own design that consists of two <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoplastic_polyurethane" target="_blank">TPU</a> plates connected at ten points along the shoe by rubber baffles. In addition to potentially lasting longer than traditional soles, the plate is meant to provide better cushioning and a more responsive stride for a variety of different running styles. And for $200 a pair, these shoes had certainly better knock one’s socks off. I wasn’t convinced at first. Initially, the shoe’s firm ride was a little off-putting. But it wasn’t long before I started appreciating the tough love. The foamless sole acts kind of like a leaf spring, compressing with the impact of each strike, and it adapted to a variety of strikes. I felt supported and cushioned whether I ran with my usual forefoot strike or the plodding heelstrike that I devolve into after mile ten or so. But I was able to pull double-digit miles without feeling like my feet were getting beaten up. I felt quicker in the shoes, too. On the toe-off end of the footstrike, the plate bends to about 15 degrees, then becomes rigid and snaps back just in time to add a bit of “oomph” to every step. During my runs, this helped me maintain a high turnover rate, making the shoe feel a lot lighter than the 15 ounces my size 11s weigh in at. 自由阅读 With all the craziness going on under the foot, it can be easy to overlook the Wave Prophecy’s upper. The main component is a stretchy, mesh fabric — Mizuno calls it Dynamotion Fit — which is designed to mimic the foot’s skin, stretching and compressing with it during a run. The fabric is light and airy, and it gives the shoe’s upper a comfortable, sock-like feel. On hot-weather runs, the upper’s mesh construction let heat escape and prevented moisture from building up within the shoe. A few weeks after running in the Wave Prophecys, I went back to my old running shoes with the EVA cushioning. I thought I’d appreciate the extra padding, but the old shoes felt too soft. I felt as if I was getting less distance out of every step, sort of like running in mud. After getting used to the responsiveness of the Prophecys, my feet were begging to go back. It was like driving a Porsche, then suddenly being asked to swap it for a crappy old minivan. I’ll stick with the Porsche. WIRED Stiff, dual-plate midsole system gives a subtle snap to every step. Responsive, comfortable upper. Potentially the most durable running shoe ever. TIRED May be too firm for some runners. Potentially the most expensive running shoe ever.

fox0923 · 发表于 2011-7-15 22:52:22

[越障2-8]---重头戏来了~~ Why Winners Win at … The new science of triumph in sports, business, and life. by <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/authors/nick-summers.html" target="_blank">Nick Summers</a>July 11, 2011 Tony O'Brien / Action Images-ZUMA Serbia's Novak Djokovic at Wimbledon on June 25. Andre Agassi Was losing. A lot. After a meteoric start to his professional tennis career, with the best return and fastest reflexes in the game, Agassi had become a chronic underachiever by the early 1990s, dropping early matches and choking in finals alike. And in Key Biscayne, Fla., in March 1994, he was set to lose again—badly—this time to a Pete Sampras who had been nearly incapacitated by food poisoning just moments before the match was to begin. Frustrated and rudderless, Agassi agreed to have dinner with a prospective new coach, a man whose tennis he didn’t much admire. Brad Gilbert was the anti-Agassi, a moderately talented junker who in his own career had eked out matches he had no right to win. His book about tactics, just published, was titled Winning Ugly. At dinner in Key Biscayne, Agassi wanted an honest assessment of his game. Why did he keep losing to less skilled players? Gilbert excoriated him for trying to play with perfection. Instead of risking a killer shot on every point, why not keep the ball in play and give the other guy a chance to lose? “It’s all about your head, man,” Gilbert said, as Agassi recalls in his memoir, Open. “With your talent, if you’re fifty percent game-wise, but ninety-five percent head-wise, you’re going to win. But if you’re ninety-five percent game-wise and fifty percent head-wise, you’re going to lose, lose, lose.” Agassi hired him on the spot. An immediate losing streak ensued, as Gilbert razed and rebuilt his game. But gradually Agassi began to pull out wins in matches that the old Agassi would have lost, and five months later he bulldozed his way to his first U.S. Open championship. “I fall to my knees,” Agassi writes of the moment in Open. “My eyes fill with tears. I look to my box ... You know everything you need to know about people when you see their faces at the moments of your greatest triumph. I’ve believed in Brad’s talent from the beginning, but now, seeing his pure and unrestrained happiness for me, I believe unrestrainedly in him.” At last his head was clear. Symbolically, and seismically, Agassi shaved his iconic glam locks—and punked Sampras in four sets to win his second straight Grand Slam, the 1995 Australian Open, en route to his first career No. 1 ranking. There would be more losses, many more, in his long career. But Andre Agassi had learned how to win. What is it that separates winners from losers? The pat answer is that, in sports at least, winners simply have certain things that mortals don’t—as one might conclude from watching the suddenly indefatigable Novak Djokovic, the Wimbledon and Australian Open champion, who has lost exactly once in his first 49 matches this year. But fitness doesn’t tell the full story. “There are more players that have the talent to be the best in the world than there are winners,” says Timothy Gallwey, the author of several books about the mental side of tennis, golf, and other pursuits. “One way of looking at it is that winners get in their own way less. They interfere with the raw expression of talent less. And to do that, first they win the war against fear, against doubt, against insecurity—which are no minor victories.” Defined that way, winning becomes translatable into areas beyond the physical: chess, spelling bees, the corporate world, even combat. You can’t go forever down that road, of course. The breadth of our colloquial definition for winning—the fact that we use the same word for being handed an Oscar as for successfully prosecuting a war—means that there is no single gene for victory across all fields, no cerebral on-off switch that turns also-rans into champions. But neuroscientists, psychologists, and other researchers are beginning to better understand the highly interdisciplinary concept of winning, finding surprising links between brain chemistry, social theory, and even economics, which together give new insight into why some people come out on top again and again. One area being disrupted relates to dominance, a decent laboratory stand-in for winning. Scientists have long thought that dominance is largely determined by testosterone: the more you have, the more likely you are to prevail, and not just on the playing field. Testosterone is desirable in the boardroom, in the courthouse, and in other scenarios that reward risk and bold action. Twenty-five years ago, scientists proved the hormone’s role in winning streaks: a win gives you a jolt of T, which gives you an edge in your next competition, which gives you more T, and so on, in a virtuous sex-hormone feedback loop. Last August, though, researchers at the University of Texas and Columbia found that testosterone is helpful only when regulated by small amounts of another hormone called cortisol. What’s more, for those with a lot of cortisol in their blood, high levels of testosterone may actually impede winning. Across Columbia’s campus, professors at the business school are putting this dominance science into practice, swabbing saliva samples from M.B.A. students to measure both hormones. Each subject is then given a prescription to get the two steroids into ideal balance: eat whole grains and cut out coffee to lower the cortisol; hit the weight room and take vitamin B to raise testosterone. Just before a crucial confrontation, standing in a certain “power pose” can calibrate the hormones temporarily. The ideal leader, says Prof. Paul Ingram, is “calm, but with an urge towards dominance.” (Picture Apple CEO Steve Jobs onstage, unveiling a blockbuster product.) It’s true for both men and women, and in theory it all adds up to winning a contract, winning a promotion, winning the quarter. New science like this illuminates winners of the past. It’s a peek inside the bloodstream of perhaps the most thrilling competitor to ever eviscerate his opponents at a pensive task: Bobby Fischer, the chess champion. “For Fischer, there was a relentless desire to decimate his opponent,” says Liz Garbus, the director of the new documentary Bobby Fischer Against the World. “Bobby took delight in how he made his opponent ill. There was something of a sadism to the way he approached it.” Before his legendary showdown with Russian archnemesis Boris Spassky in Iceland in 1972, which would determine the world’s No. 1 player, Fischer underwent extensive weight and endurance training; he told a strength coach that he wanted to physically break Spassky’s hand the first time they shook. As the match approached, Fischer hemmed and hawed and would not show up, issuing increasingly bizarre demands and exasperating his foe before play had even begun. “I don’t believe in psychology,” Fischer said of the mind games. “I believe in good moves.” With the world watching, he did eventually arrive in Reykjavik, and with the match tied 2½ to 2½, Fischer coolly uncorked a move that caught Spassky with his pants down: pawn to c4. Fischer always, always opened with his king’s pawn; it was the only configuration Spassky had prepared for, and in this uncharted territory the Russian was helpless. Fischer’s relentless belligerence had crescendoed to a sublime and understated play, which he followed with further aggression. Spassky never recovered. He managed just one win in the next 15 games, and Fischer and his mind and the testosterone-cortisol cocktail within were No. 1 in the world. What’s better than winning? Doing it while someone else loses. An economist at the University of Bonn has shown that test subjects who receive a given reward for a task enjoy it significantly more if other subjects fail or do worse—a finding that upends traditional economic theories that absolute reward is a person’s central motivation. It’s one of several new inroads into the social dynamics of winning yielded by neuroeconomics, a trendy new field that mixes elements of neuroscience, economics, and cognitive psychology to determine why people make the choices they do—even, or especially, the irrational ones. Neuroeconomic studies often involve the dopamine system, a part of the brain that is highly involved with rewards and reward anticipation. Dopamine receptors seem to track possibilities—an arcing tennis ball that may land in or out—and how expected or unexpected they are. For fans, it helps to explain why a win by a No. 1 seed over an unranked challenger is no big deal, while underdog victors like the 1980 U.S. Olympic hockey team are so electrifying. A similar kind of expectation management occurs in the minds of athletes themselves, says Scott Huettel, the director of Duke University’s Center for Neuroeconomic Studies. If you ranked an Olympic event’s three medalists by happiness, the athlete winning gold obviously comes first. What’s fascinating, Huettel says, is that the bronze medalist is second-most delighted, and the silver finisher is most distraught. “People’s brains are constantly comparing what happened with what could have happened,” he says. “A bronze medalist might say, ‘Wow, I almost didn’t get a medal. It’s great to be on the stand!’ And the silver medalist is just thinking about all the mistakes he made that prevented him from winning gold.” All countries love winning, of course. But America, a nation born through victory on the battlefield, has a special relationship with the practice. “When you here, every one of you, were kids, you all admired the champion marble player, the fastest runner, the toughest boxer, the big-league ballplayers, and the All-American football players,” Gen. George S. Patton once told a gathering of U.S. Army troops in England. “Americans love a winner,” Patton thundered. “Americans will not tolerate a loser.” The next day was June 6, 1944, D-Day, and these were the men who would invade Normandy. We know where that one goes in the win-loss column. But why do we admire winners—and put so much of our own happiness at stake when watching them compete? At some level of the brain, we think we are the guys in the fray. On Nov. 4, 2008, the night of the most recent presidential election, neuroscientists at Duke and the University of Michigan gave a group of voters some chewing gum. They collected samples at 8 p.m., as the polls closed, and again at 11:30, as Barack Obama was announced the winner. Testosterone levels normally drop around that time of night, but not among Obama supporters—while testosterone plummeted in gum taken from the men who had voted for John McCain. Vicarious participation, the scientists concluded, mirrors what happens to the principal competitors themselves; the same thing happens in men who watch football and basketball—and, it follows, any other fiercely fought contest, from Andre Agassi’s greatest matches to Bobby Fischer’s run at the Russians. Why do Americans love a winner? Because it lets us love ourselves. <a href="http://www.newsweek.com/2011/07/10/the-new-science-of-triumph.print.html" target="_blank">http://www.newsweek.com/2011/07/10/the-new-science-of-triumph.print.html</a>

fox0923 · 发表于 2011-7-15 22:53:54

星期五了，应该换一下脑子，看几篇有关于运动和季节方面的文章，所以选了summer heat和一篇跑鞋的推荐的文章（哈哈，mizuno是我比较爱的一个牌子，虽然比较贵）。 至于越障，本来是想选一篇书籍介绍的，不过最后决定选了运动和science相结合的文章，虽然这一大段比较长，但我觉得它不像science文章那么枯燥，在作研究的同时又可以感受到活力，所以还是比较推崇的。。 ~~祝大家enjoy summer night!~~

ccmoom · 发表于 2011-7-15 23:08:09

我都是晚上来~``  每次都看到两篇，感觉好有压力哦~    O(∩_∩)O~ 今天有跑出去玩了，晚上熬夜把任务做完~

抓抓sandra · 发表于 2011-7-15 23:15:40

<div class="maxcode-quote">
星期五了，应该换一下脑子，看几篇有关于运动和季节方面的文章，所以选了summer heat和一篇跑鞋的推荐的文章（哈哈，mizuno是我比较爱的一个牌子，虽然比较贵）。 至于越障，本来是想选一篇书籍介绍的，不过最后决定选了运动和science相结合的文章，虽然这一大段比较长，但我觉得它不像science文章那么枯燥，在作研究的同时又可以感受到活力，所以还是比较推崇的。。 ~~祝大家enjoy summer night!~~ <div style="text-align:right;">-- by 会员 fox0923 (2011/7/15 22:53:54)</div> 
</div>
 水一个。。我就是穿MIZUNO的跑鞋~~哇咔咔~真的很贵~~

抓抓sandra · 发表于 2011-7-15 23:16:34

<div class="maxcode-quote">
我都是晚上来~``  每次都看到两篇，感觉好有压力哦~    O(∩_∩)O~ 今天有跑出去玩了，晚上熬夜把任务做完~<div style="text-align:right;">-- by 会员 ccmoom (2011/7/15 23:08:09)</div> 
</div>
 CC，要可持续发展啊~~熬夜的话明天会很没精神的，效率更低哇。。

fox0923 · 发表于 2011-7-15 23:59:18

速度2-9 1。60s 2。1行 3。1.5行 4。6行（不知道读什么去了） 5。3行 自由阅读：<60s 之后没读完的就没记，抓抓，你是说还要记录1min后读的内容的时间吗？ 越障2-8战绩 时间没仔细算，大概得有13-14分钟吧。 1.Agassi曾经是一名以反应敏捷和速度著称的优秀网球运动员，但在1990年后开始连连挫败给对手甚至是不知名的小球员。 2.于是他找到了他现在的教练Gilbert并和他探讨为何他的运动生涯走下坡路，而Gilbert批评他是太过于希望把每件事都做到最好，而并没有给对手在适当的机会得分以助于大局的胜利。 3.在Agassi雇佣了Gilbert以后，Gilbert建议他应该在比赛中更好的利用自己的头脑大过于自己在比赛中的实力。在这之后每次的网球赛中全部得冠并进入了美国网球公开赛和澳洲网球公开赛，并最终夺得了第一的头衔。 4.于是科学家开始分析胜利者为什么会胜利，是否和其技术含量有关还是有其他原因？研究表明人类的大脑中有一种T荷尔蒙，而拥有这种荷尔蒙越多的人赢的机会也就越大，同样的理论结合于各种比赛，会议，法庭，甚至经济上也是适用的。 5.之后一些科学家开始又发现了一种C的与荷尔蒙类似的物质，这种物质如果存积在人类身体中过多，同时T也过多的话，T会抑制胜利的机会。 6.为了进行深入的研究，一些教授对于哥伦比亚大学的MBA学生进行头脑进行一项试验。实验内容主要是让MBA学生减少C的摄取而增加T的摄取，包括增加vitamin B以及全麦食物的摄取。结果表明这些实验后的MBA学生达到了短暂的T量增加的效果. 7.研究院同时又以过去的比赛事实F和R来说明另一个重要的因素。F最后赢了比赛主要是因为他的自信和顽强的精神战胜了对手（什么比赛忘了），由此，研究员发现一种dopamine的物质的丰富可以造成人们信心的加强，所以由于做事的大胆也就消除了不稳定的因素，这样能够加大赢的机会。而在赢了第一次后，这些胜利者的信心就被增加了，所以还会有第二次第三次的胜利。而Agassi就是一个很好的例子。 8.美国人都喜欢赢而不容许失败，发现表明人类都是具有抗争意识的，所以我们愿意看到胜利者并为之欢呼。对于胜利者本身，科学家又举了一个例子：一般得铜牌的比赛者相对来说是最开心的，主要是因为他会觉得拿到第三名已经很不容易至少没有出线；而第二名则是最不开心的，因为他只会一直思考为什么还差一点点没拿到金牌，自己犯了什么过失。所以说人们在胜利时的不同阶段感觉也是不同的。 9.最后结论说为什么我们热爱胜利者，那是因为我们爱自己。（这句话说得好好，呵呵，发表一下读者观点）。

fox0923 · 发表于 2011-7-16 00:02:40

<div class="maxcode-quote">

<div class="maxcode-quote">
星期五了，应该换一下脑子，看几篇有关于运动和季节方面的文章，所以选了summer heat和一篇跑鞋的推荐的文章（哈哈，mizuno是我比较爱的一个牌子，虽然比较贵）。 至于越障，本来是想选一篇书籍介绍的，不过最后决定选了运动和science相结合的文章，虽然这一大段比较长，但我觉得它不像science文章那么枯燥，在作研究的同时又可以感受到活力，所以还是比较推崇的。。 ~~祝大家enjoy summer night!~~ <div style="text-align:right;">-- by 会员 fox0923 (2011/7/15 22:53:54)</div> 
</div>
 水一个。。我就是穿MIZUNO的跑鞋~~哇咔咔~真的很贵~~<div style="text-align:right;">-- by 会员 抓抓sandra (2011/7/15 23:15:40)</div> 
</div>
 是啊，所以到现在我还没有一双，不过现在穿的是Asics的，是我的第一首选。。等到考好了再买双Mizuno来孝敬自己。。嘿嘿。

【第一期阅读小分队（已结束）】【每日阅读练习贴——速度+越障】【一楼汇总】（另附CD首发花儿阅读教材PDF）

1--7确实简单点

今天的速度越障选贴说明~~

所属分类: 小分队

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

浏览过的版块