讨论一道boldface题

juan

Editorial: An arrest made by a Midville police officer is provisional
until the officer has taken the suspect to the police station and the
watch commander has officially approved the arrest. Such approval is
denied if the commander judges that the evidence on which the
provisional arrest is based is insufficient. A government efficiency
expert has found that almost all provisional arrests meet standards for adequacy of evidence that watch commanders enforce. The expert therefore recommends that the watch commander's approval should no longer be required since the officers'time spent obtaining approval is largely wasted.This recommendation should be rejected as dangerous , however, since there is no assurance that the watch commanders' standards will continue to be observed once approval is no longer required.



A. The first is a recommendation made by the editorial; the second
acknolwledges a potential objection against that recommendation.

B. The first is a proposal against which the editorial is directed; the
second is a judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.

C. The first provides evidence in support of a recommendation that the
editorial supports; the second is the conclusion reached by the
editorial.

D. The first is a position that the editorial challenges; the second is
a judgment that was made in support of that challenged position.

E. The first is a recommendation that the editorial questions; the second provides evidence against that recommendation.



大家讨论看看正确答案是哪个? 我对所谓的正确答案有些疑问. 稍后公布.共同讨论.

谢谢 .

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-17 23:17:33编辑过]

dashasha

挫子里拔高个，D？

mariezhu

偶同意D

juan

谢谢dashasha MM和marie MM.

我也选D。不过答案是B。

我怀疑题目的boldface位置错了。大家看呢？

谢谢指点。

robertchu

Agree.   

juan

谢谢robertchu,我怀疑该boldface的是红线部分。你看呢？

谢谢。

robertchu

Almost agree.
The judgment reached by the editorial concerning that proposal.could be"recommendation should be rejected as dangerous", and "there is noassurance that the watch commanders' standards will continue to beobserved once approval is no longer required" could be the reasoning ofthe judgement.