ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
Yorco and Zortech are two corporations that employ large numbers of full-time workers who are paid by the hour. Publicly available records indicate that Yorco employs roughly the same number of such hourly wage workers as Zortech does but spends a far higher total sum per year on wages for such workers. Therefore, hourly wages must be higher, on average, at Yorco than at Zortech, since _____.

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3448|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助各位牛人一道GWD!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-5-24 01:14:19 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

Yorco and Zortech are two corporations that employ large numbers of full-time workers who are paid by the hour.Publicly available records indicate that Yorco employs roughly the same number of such hourly wage workers as Zortech does but spends a far higher total sum per year on wages for such workers.Therefore, hourly wages must be higher,on average, at Yorco than at Zortech, since _____.

A.Zortech spends a higher total sum per year than Yorco does to provide its hourly wage workers with benefits other than wages

B.the work performed by hourly wage workers at Zortech does not require a significantly higher level of skill than the work performed by hourly wage workers at Yorco does

C.the proportion of all company employees who are hourly wage workers is significantly greater at Yorco than it is at Zortech

D.overtime work, which is paid at a substantially higher rate than work done during the regular work week, is rare at both Yorco and Zortech

E.the highest hourly wages paid at Yorco are higher than the highest hourly wages paid at Zortech


木有解释,答案是D。可是D说rare at both Y and Z..我觉得就没法说明了啊。。求指教
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-5-24 07:26:17 | 只看该作者
D is the right choice because it eliminates an alternative reason to explain the higher total sum in wages at Y. Regular hourly pay is different from overtime pay, the latter might be twice as high as the former.
板凳
发表于 2011-5-24 10:50:27 | 只看该作者
D是排除其他可能的原因从而support conclusion. 题目说Y和Z的员工数量一样, 但是total wage expense Y比Z要多. 结论是Y的时新比Z多. 那么这里存在一个可能就是Y的员工可以做很多OT, 这样子的话就算Y的时薪比Z低, 还是会可能出现 那个结论. D就是正正排除了这个可能性
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-5-24 22:26:05 | 只看该作者
哦。。我知道我的问题出在哪了。这道题里的OVER-TIME PAY 和HOURLY WAGES应该分开考虑,我把这两个概念混为一谈了。一出现概念多的比较我就容易进入逻辑盲区。通过这道题发现一个大问题。。谢谢各位的解释!受益匪浅~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 04:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部