That is just an example to show the reality. If you want to see more samples, use Google to find more. Some articles online also described the phenomenon. You can use the search engine to find those info. I would prefer to believe the point of "faculty job in Asia is way much better than something" is your personal view. The guy I mentioned in the pharmaceutical company is proud to work on that position. It seems that he never considered to become a professor.
your implicit assumption is that these two ppl are homogeneous except for their majors and schools. Is that true? moreover, your sample size is too small, so do not generalize. BTW, faculty job in asian is way much better than a sas programmer job in pharmaceutical company in the states.
为什么总是估计呢? 我亲眼见到同一个学校毕业的Finance PhD 和生物统计PhD的结果不同。那个Finance的是北大本硕,gmat狂高,导师是他的领域前25的学者。可是没有找到美国合适职位,去了亚洲。 生物统计的那个是武汉大学本科,一个破美国学校硕士,结果去了美国大药厂总部。专业对就业和未来影响重大。
难道你觉得大家又真的是热爱生物和计算机吗? 国内有多少人是根据自己的天赋和兴趣读的专业呢?真正有兴趣有天赋的人读不了,没天赋没兴趣的被逼着去读 既然已经无关兴趣了,那为什么不现实点,选个回报高点的专业继续读呢 -- by 会员 cobbleqxz (2011/5/18 12:38:13)
这个评论的前提假设是商科博士回报率比理工科的高? 事实真的如此么? 我认识几个同一个学校的FinancePhd (那个领域还是美国前几名的。导师是前25的人, 美国没有机会去了亚洲,工资会降一个等级)就业还不如生物统计的呢。 control和treatment的人都完全不一样,你比个啥劲啊。这些人到了生物统计,估计连工作都找不到。商科留在美国找工作不见的比那三个理工专业的容易呢。 -- by 会员 alashanghai (2011/5/18 17:25:34)
-- by 会员 IVOWELCH (2011/5/19 9:03:43)
-- by 会员 alashanghai (2011/5/19 10:33:42)
-- by 会员 IVOWELCH (2011/5/19 11:58:02)
|