问一道题

scholar

There is no reasonwhy the work of scientists has to be officially confirmed before beingpublished. There is a system in place for the confirmation or disconfirmationof scientific findings, namely, the replication of results by other scientists.Poor scientific work on the part of any one scientists, which can includeanything from careless reporting practices to fraud, is not harmful. It will beexposed and rendered harmless when other scientists conduct experiments andobtain disconfirmatory results.
Which one of the following, if true, would weaken theargument?    KEY A


A.     Scientificexperiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.
B.     Mostscientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer reviewbefore publication.
C.     Mostscientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny ofreplication.
D.     Inscientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.
E.      Mostscientists work as part of a team rather than alone.

sdcar2010

If A is true, then "the system for the confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings" will not work any more. Then the conclusion, which is the first sentence of the stimulus, is baseless.

fuknokia

what question do you have?! buddy/