ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2132|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

问一题逻辑!求救!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-24 18:02:57 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
From 1980 to 1989, total consumption of fish in the country of Jurania increased by 4.5 percent, and total consumption of poultry products there increased by 9.0 percent.During the same period, the population of Jurania increased by 6 percent, in part due to immigration to Jurania from other countries in the region.
If the statements above are true, which of the following must also be true on the basis of them
A.
During the 1980’s in Jurania, profits of wholesale distributors of poultry products increased at a greater rate than did profits of wholesale distributors of fish.
B.For people who immigrated to Jurania during the 1980’s, fish was less likely to be a major part of their diet than was poultry.
C.In 1989 Juranians consumed twice as much poultry as fish.
D.For a significant proportion of Jurania’s population, both fish and poultry products were a regular part of their diet during the 1980’s.
E.Per capita consumption of fish in Jurania was lower in 1989 than in 1980.
答案是E,但为什么B不对?是因为不知道基数大小吗?还是因为文中说增长的人数中移民只占部分(in part),所以B中说移民的人不喜欢鱼是有偏误的?


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-4-24 18:50:44 | 只看该作者
增加了4.5 % 那么总数是104.5% 增加了 9.0%  那么 总数是109%   不是俩倍关系
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-4-24 19:11:00 | 只看该作者
呃,我没有问C选项,是B选项!
地板
发表于 2011-4-24 21:44:04 | 只看该作者
B不一定是must be true,假设移民过去的人特别喜欢鱼,并且他们消费的fish比poultry多,如果这样的话,按照题意,本地人就应该现在消费的poultry比fish多才可以达到题中的增长情况。
如果本地人没有移民那么的喜欢鱼,并且当年鱼的价格上涨,那么本地人就会减少鱼增加p的消费,由于移民对鱼的偏好实在太强了,所以价格上涨也不能减少鱼的消费量,那么B就不对了。
我觉得可以想象很多种B不成立的情况,但是E是must be true的。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-26 16:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部