aeoluseros 发表于 2011-4-17 22:19
prep#2 --187187To develop more accurate population forecasts, demographers i（have to know a great d ...
这里a greater proportion than后面依旧是可以补出it had been，that或着不补出，in any previous election已经明确是介词短语，不给使读者产生” a greater proportion”和“in any previous election”比较的歧义，所以就不需要补出了
在我看来“it had been”是不能补出的，因为it全指代“a greater proportation”而不是核心指代“a proportation”,然而补出“that”却是可以的。
taxpayers who make more than twice as much income as THEY DID last year are subject to special scrutiny from the IRS. 我觉得这里是部分比较吧，因为more是修饰的twice,而twice修饰的income，因此more 跟动词make没有关系，而是部分修饰。如果是部分修饰的话是不是这样也是对的呢？taxpayers who make more than twice as much income as THAT last year are subject to special scrutiny from the IRS.
版主大大还在吗，能解决我一个疑惑吗？
我看到比较的时候需要补出that/those等来排除歧义，但是that/those不是仅仅指代了核心词吗，比如我举两个例子：
1. Today's technology allows manufacturers to make small cars that are more fuel-efficient than those at any other time in production history.
这题的比较应该是比较small cars的吧，后面的those是不是把small这个修饰给去除了，变成small cars 和 cars的比较呢？
2. 还有一个例子：
Bihar is India's poorest state, with an annual per capita income of $111, lower than that of the most impoverished countries of the world.
为啥这里也可以用that呢，我觉得that岂不是把annual 这个修饰除去了吗？
另外，这一个题有一个选项是 lower than in the most imorverished countries of the world. 这个选项不能使用是不是因为than前面没有与之平行的结构呢？
关于歧义以前看到过一个例子觉得很简单粗暴，特来分享一下~
I like cheese more than Roger.
既可以理解为比起Roger这个人，我跟喜欢cheese；也可以理解为我，比起Roger更喜欢cheese
如果是第二种理解，这里就要补出do，也就是I like cheese more than Roger do.
不同语境下对于歧义都值得注意
[复制链接]
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2014-8-11 08:53:31
