ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1696|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

另外一道整体

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-6-2 01:30:00 | 只看该作者

另外一道整体

Q40:


Until mow, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available.  arents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated.  A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children.  However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.



Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?




  • Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well.


  • The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as jnjectable vaccines do.


  • The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.


  • Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.


  • The nasal spray vaccine is mot effective when administered to adults.


  • No children will use new vaccination-àno economic application of such vaccination


    排除他因:adult will not use new vaccination either


    这样的逻辑有什么错


    答案D,想不通啊

    沙发
    发表于 2004-6-2 02:11:00 | 只看该作者
    这道题属于不用看选项就知道要ASSUME什么, 只有一个可能, 小孩的感冒不传染给大人, 所以小孩免疫好处不大. 仔细看题目最后一句话.
    板凳
    发表于 2004-6-2 04:15:00 | 只看该作者

    Agree with GreenHorse!

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

    手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 06:04
    京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

    ChaseDream 论坛

    © 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

    返回顶部