[求助]看了十遍没看懂的句子

joywzy

2.    （This is ）A desire to throw over reality a light  that never was might give away abruptly to the desire on the part of what we might consider a novelist-scientist to record exactly and concretely the structure and texture of a flower .(5++)

我要死了.死也看不懂.

siebel

好快的手！

机考中绝无可能出现的登峰造极难句，同学们可以废掉不读。

1stzhang

这个是杨鹏难句中的，你查查

fair_sword

笨笨！！，我都不小心把它给背下了，念30遍，你就知道意思了

归零

give=>given

This is a desire (to throw over reality a light) that never was might given away abruptly to the desire (on the part of what we might consider) a novelist-scientist to record exactly and concretely (the structure and texture of a flower).

这是一种照亮现实的欲望，此欲望不会唐突的取代后面的那种欲望，后者是我们可以部分理解为一个兼任小说家和科学家的人想要去准确并具体的记录下一朵花的结构和纹理的那种意义上的欲望。——《难句》

个人理解，即我所标注的非括号内容——后半句中所说的一种准确并具体的欲望，优于前半句所说的一种朴素的现实性的欲望。我想，考试的时候能够理解到这里，应该够了。

fair_sword

对于理解，最后是多读，我其实没有看注释，读了大概50遍，就给背下了，同时也理解了其中的意思

gu946

这句话太难了,省略太多,太意识流了。我最怕这类文章了。

anchoret

以下是引用joywzy在2003-5-30 11:31:00的发言：
2. （This is ）A desire to throw over reality a light  that never was might give away abruptly to the desire on the part of what we might consider a novelist-scientist to record exactly and concretely the structure and texture of a flower .(5++)

我要死了.死也看不懂.

放心，机考绝无可能考这么难的句子

心静

我就是特别怕这种截选下来的科普类文章，一来晦涩难懂，前后逻辑关系不好推理，二来人名，专业词汇多多。
总结，一个字-----------晕！！！

yongchou

Try to decipher it this way:

(A desire1) /to throw over reality a light  that never was/ might give away abruptly to (the desire2) /on the part of /what we might consider /a novelist-scientist/ to record exactly and concretely the structure and texture of a flower .

1. 主句 Desire1 might give away to desire2.
2. What is desire1? --to throw a light over reality(now) that never was (before).
3. What is desire2?-- to record exactly......
               and whose desire2?---
Got it ?
------------------
1. No "This is " is needed here. Do you add it yourself ? Please tell me.
2. "give=>given " should be a big mistake, since "might given "is wrong.

Hope do some help

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-6-18 10:25:58编辑过]