15. (26883-!-item-!-188;#058&002985) [GWD #29-Q28]
Astronomer: Observations of theShoemaker-Levi comet on its collision course with Jupiter showed that the cometbroke into fragments before entering Jupiter's atmosphere in 1994, but they didnot show how big those fragments were.以上描述一个背景 In hopes ofgaining some indication of the fragments' size,目的 astronomers studied spectrographic analyses of Jupiter's outeratmosphere. These analyses revealedunprecedented traces of sulfur after the fragments' entry. 之前没有转折 The fragments themselves almost certainly containedno sulfur, but many astronomers believe that the cloud layer below Jupiter'souter atmosphere does contain sulfur. Since sulfur would have seeped into the outeratmosphere if comet fragments had penetrated this cloud layer, it is likelythat some of the fragments were at least large enough to have passed through Jupiter's outer atmospherewithout being burned up.
In the astronomer's argument, thetwo portions in boldface play which of the following roles?
(A) The first presents acircumstance for which the astronomer offers an explanation; the second is part of that explanation.
(B) The first acknowledges aconsideration that weighs against the conclusion of the argument; the second isthat conclusion.
(C) The first acknowledges aconsideration that weighs against the conclusion of the argument; the secondprovides evidence in support of that conclusion.
(D) The first provides evidence insupport of the conclusion of the argument; the second acknowledges aconsideration that weighs against that conclusion.
(E) The first is a judgment advanced in support of theconclusion of the argument; the second is that conclusion.
搜索下来答案应该是E,但还是不确定。我个人的理解BF1和BF2不是对立关系,所以BCD淘汰。哪位nn来解释一下A和E怎么区分?谢谢!!
|