ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2735|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助一道逻辑题~!马上就考了~!牛牛帮忙~!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-3-6 13:48:54 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development.  They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it.  That plan is ill-conceived:  if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders.  On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires.  And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

A.    The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
B.    The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
C.    The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
D.    The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
E.    The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.


答案说是D,可是我怎么看怎么觉得D怪怪的!
求教大牛们~!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-6 13:55:05 | 只看该作者
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-6 15:35:11 | 只看该作者
自己顶一顶~!着急哇~!
地板
发表于 2011-3-6 15:44:39 | 只看该作者
黑体字是神马啊。。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-6 17:06:45 | 只看该作者
之前没把黑体弄好
6#
发表于 2011-3-6 17:43:41 | 只看该作者
A argument没有拒绝这目标,拒绝的是先提出来的一种措施
B 没说这个目标不能实现,否定一个方案后来不是又提出来一个方案
C题目也没说这个目标能实现 要能实现也得用第二个方案,而后面质疑的是第一个方案,所以肯定错
D说提出一个目标,而且很多正在争论的策略就是为了实现这个目标。后面也是对的,假如仍能耕地,农民不会卖地。因为这,提出第二个方案使地保持可耕,那么也就不会被作为住宅用地
E第二句话没说这种情况应该改变啊
我码了好多字啊~~
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-3-6 18:49:52 | 只看该作者
哦~~明白了~!多谢~!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-28 14:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部