ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 14583|回复: 30
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12~CR~121求助啊~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-1-9 13:36:29 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
121.Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient
Roman medical treatise,.is undated but contains clues
to when it was produced. Its first 80 pages are by a
single copyist, but the remaining 20 pages are by
three different copyists, which indicates some
significant disruption. Since a letter in handwriting
identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a
plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148,
Codex Berinensis was probably produced in that year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports
the hypothesis that Codex Berinensis was produced
in 1148?

(A)Other than Codex Berinensis, there are no
known samples of the handwriting of the first
three copyists.

(B)According to the account by the fourth copyist,
the plague went on for 10 months.

(C)A scribe would be able to copy a page of text
the size and style of Codex Berinensis in a day.

(D)There was only one outbreak of plague in
Florence in the 1100s.

(E)The number of pages of Codex Berinensis
produced by a single scribe becomes smaller
with each successive change of copyist.
答案选D,我实在是看不清里面的逻辑关系,为什么 a letter in handwriting
identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148就可以断定它产生于1148年呢?
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-1-9 16:28:54 | 只看该作者
http://forum.topway.org/viewthread.php?tid=159448

你看看有没有帮助吧~
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-9 17:22:22 | 只看该作者
那个网址我上不去~~
地板
发表于 2011-1-10 18:13:51 | 只看该作者
同问。。。。。。
5#
发表于 2011-1-11 13:40:25 | 只看该作者
121.Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient
Roman medical treatise,.is undated but contains clues
to when it was produced. Its first 80 pages are by a
single copyist, but the remaining 20 pages are by
three different copyists, which indicates some
significant disruption. Since a letter in handwriting
identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a
plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148,
Codex Berinensis was probably produced in that year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports
the hypothesis that Codex Berinensis was produced
in 1148?

(A)Other than Codex Berinensis, there are no
known samples of the handwriting of the first
three copyists.

(B)According to the account by the fourth copyist,
the plague went on for 10 months.

(C)A scribe would be able to copy a page of text
the size and style of Codex Berinensis in a day.

(D)There was only one outbreak of plague in
Florence in the 1100s.

(E)The number of pages of Codex Berinensis
produced by a single scribe becomes smaller
with each successive change of copyist.
答案选D,我实在是看不清里面的逻辑关系,为什么 a letter in handwriting
identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148就可以断定它产生于1148年呢?
-- by 会员 lhnstefsun (2011/1/9 13:36:29)



楼主太善良了,完全被GMAC骗了呀……
a letter in handwriting identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148中只有1148年有用,其他都是废话呀。这句话对全文的贡献是:我们有确切的证据表明1148年发生过一次瘟疫。至于,证据是什么,这不应是Taker关心的事情。
原文的逻辑是
前提:
1、手稿换人,说明人死了,原因是瘟疫
2、我们知道1148年有一次瘟疫
结论:
手稿写于1148年 <= 这才是结论

所以很明显其间有一个假设,
历史上只有这一次瘟疫
6#
发表于 2011-3-12 18:53:36 | 只看该作者
楼上讲的我不懂啊,我觉得1100和1148完全无关  除了瘟疫有点关系哎  跪求详解
7#
发表于 2011-3-26 04:37:34 | 只看该作者
楼上讲的我不懂啊,我觉得1100和1148完全无关  除了瘟疫有点关系哎  跪求详解
-- by 会员 鱼鱼没有水 (2011/3/12 18:53:36)





你那里不懂啊 是1100S。。。
8#
发表于 2011-5-5 16:02:56 | 只看该作者
121.Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient
Roman medical treatise,.is undated but contains clues
to when it was produced. Its first 80 pages are by a
single copyist, but the remaining 20 pages are by
three different copyists, which indicates some
significant disruption. Since a letter in handwriting
identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a
plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148,
Codex Berinensis was probably produced in that year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports
the hypothesis that Codex Berinensis was produced
in 1148?

(A)Other than Codex Berinensis, there are no
known samples of the handwriting of the first
three copyists.

(B)According to the account by the fourth copyist,
the plague went on for 10 months.

(C)A scribe would be able to copy a page of text
the size and style of Codex Berinensis in a day.

(D)There was only one outbreak of plague in
Florence in the 1100s.

(E)The number of pages of Codex Berinensis
produced by a single scribe becomes smaller
with each successive change of copyist.
答案选D,我实在是看不清里面的逻辑关系,为什么 a letter in handwriting
identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148就可以断定它产生于1148年呢?
-- by 会员 lhnstefsun (2011/1/9 13:36:29)




楼主太善良了,完全被GMAC骗了呀……
a letter in handwriting identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148中只有1148年有用,其他都是废话呀。这句话对全文的贡献是:我们有确切的证据表明1148年发生过一次瘟疫。至于,证据是什么,这不应是Taker关心的事情。
原文的逻辑是
前提:
1、手稿换人,说明人死了,原因是瘟疫
2、我们知道1148年有一次瘟疫
结论:
手稿写于1148年 <= 这才是结论

所以很明显其间有一个假设,
历史上只有这一次瘟疫
-- by 会员 lonelyorchid (2011/1/11 13:40:25)

太精彩了~给力!!我也被饶进去了,感谢!
9#
发表于 2011-7-27 23:16:39 | 只看该作者
121.Codex Berinensis, a Florentine copy of an ancient
Roman medical treatise,.is undated but contains clues
to when it was produced. Its first 80 pages are by a
single copyist, but the remaining 20 pages are by
three different copyists, which indicates some
significant disruption. Since a letter in handwriting
identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a
plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148,
Codex Berinensis was probably produced in that year.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports
the hypothesis that Codex Berinensis was produced
in 1148?

(A)Other than Codex Berinensis, there are no
known samples of the handwriting of the first
three copyists.

(B)According to the account by the fourth copyist,
the plague went on for 10 months.

(C)A scribe would be able to copy a page of text
the size and style of Codex Berinensis in a day.

(D)There was only one outbreak of plague in
Florence in the 1100s.

(E)The number of pages of Codex Berinensis
produced by a single scribe becomes smaller
with each successive change of copyist.
答案选D,我实在是看不清里面的逻辑关系,为什么 a letter in handwriting
identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148就可以断定它产生于1148年呢?
-- by 会员 lhnstefsun (2011/1/9 13:36:29)




楼主太善良了,完全被GMAC骗了呀……
a letter in handwriting identified as that of the fourth copyist mentions a plague that killed many people in Florence in 1148中只有1148年有用,其他都是废话呀。这句话对全文的贡献是:我们有确切的证据表明1148年发生过一次瘟疫。至于,证据是什么,这不应是Taker关心的事情。
原文的逻辑是
前提:
1、手稿换人,说明人死了,原因是瘟疫
2、我们知道1148年有一次瘟疫
结论:
手稿写于1148年 <= 这才是结论

所以很明显其间有一个假设,
历史上只有这一次瘟疫
-- by 会员 lonelyorchid (2011/1/11 13:40:25)



题目中确实提到换人,也提到了瘟疫。但是不一定就能推出死于瘟疫啊。只是有这个可能性,为什么就变成后面推理的前提了呢?
求大牛解答 =)
10#
发表于 2011-7-31 09:45:51 | 只看该作者
e怎么错了?有瘟疫每个人写的内容越来越少。
说明大家都得病了,相继死去,最后的一个人坚持写完了。
求大神gg,散修dd,仙女mm指导
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-27 16:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部