ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1718|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求解答~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-12-16 17:14:12 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD7-Q17:
Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass surgery—a procedure widely prescribed for people with heart disease—only 75 percent benefited from the surgery.  Thus it appears that for one in four such patients, the doctors who advised them to undergo this surgery, with its attendant risks and expense, were more interested in an opportunity to practice their skills and in their fee than in helping the patient.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?

D.    The patients over 65 years old who did not benefit from the coronary bypass surgery were as fully informed as those who did benefit from the surgery as to the risks of the surgery prior to undergoing it.
E.    The patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery but who did not benefit from it were medically indistinguishable, prior to their surgery, from the patients who did benefit.
D为什么不对呢?求讲解~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-12-16 17:21:56 | 只看该作者
题目中说的是,事实:有25%的人没有因这个手术获益,结论:建议他们做这个手术的医生是为了练习自己的手术技巧以及收取费用,而不是为了帮助病人。
削弱
D 那些做了手术但没有好转的病人和好转了的病人在手术前都被告知了手术的风险
不能推出医生不是出于自己的私利而对病人进行手术
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 12:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部