放洛基狗，攒RP

草木本心

阅读3篇是狗，都是狗里面内容比较多的，不赘述了。唯一不是狗的是最后一篇，时间不够都没咋看，就不说了。

逻辑记得一点，说几道
1、在一群undergraduate中，有40%是un...（抱歉，这个单词不认识），在这40%的人中，又有三分之一是在读college期间中断过的。
然后问你下面哪个选项可以从上文得出，是结论题。5个选项都很长很复杂，记不清了，希望有NN能说说正确答案，这题我自己选的也不确定，不误人子弟了。

2、有一道boldface，题目大意如下：有一家公司反正是要改善自己的经营状况咯。于是就把员工拉出去培训，但是培训之后很多人都进入了竞争对手的公司。于是老板在之后的选人时就开始有意选择，但他发现能符合标准的员工越来越少。于是得出了这个方法不可行。问加粗二句（已标出）

3、在某个地区有一种鱼，这种鱼最近数量减少了，原因是很多人为了休闲来这里钓鱼。于是政府就出面要改善鱼的数量的减少咯。于是他们就把鱼弄到其他湖里面去养。问下面那个选项能削弱原文？答案我选的是能养这种鱼的湖在原产地附近，休闲钓鱼的人很容易就找到那些新养鱼的湖去钓鱼。

大致就这样子了，想到什么再说吧。我觉得自己数学记忆力极差么……一点都不记得了，ORZ

seyouji

113.    (30697-!-item-!-188;#058&005746)    (T-4-Q18 ???-7-17)

As a large corporation in a small country, Hachnut wants its managers to have international experience, so each year it sponsors management education abroad for its management trainees.  Hachnut has found, however, that the attrition rate of graduates from this program is very high, with many of them leaving Hachnut to join competing firms soon after completing the program.  Hachnut does use performance during the program as a criterion in deciding among candidates for management positions, but both this function and the goal of providing international experience could be achieved in other ways.  Therefore, if the attrition problem cannot be successfully addressed, Hachnut should discontinue the sponsorship program.
In the argument given, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?
A. The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to justify; the second states a judgment that is used in support of a justification for that practice.
B. The first describes a practice that the argument seeks to explain; the second presents part of the argument's explanation of that practice.
C. The first introduces a practice that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the practice cannot achieve its objective.
D. The first introduces a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides grounds for holding that the policy is not needed.
E. The first introduces a consideration supporting a policy that the argument seeks to evaluate; the second provides evidence for concluding that the policy should be abandoned.

zonghualiu

顶

草木本心

确实就是这道题目，连公司的名字都没改。
但是我比较肯定的觉得5个选项不是这样表达的=0=

zonghualiu

LZ可以对照JJ回忆一下阅读以方便考古

seyouji

tu

草木本心

嗯，嗯，是这道题哇
可是画线部分不对的啦。

选项。。。我觉得很像，算了糊涂了
我好囧哇。。。我就是选了C的选项，感觉我选的和这个很像。。。555

zonghualiu

LZ讲的划线部分与上面的不一样

草木本心

不想看到阅读，这次做VERBAL清晰的感受到了语法和逻辑的给力以及阅读的无力。。。

zonghualiu

谢谢楼主