Rabbits were introduced to Numa Island in the nineteenth century. Overgrazing by the enormous population of rabbits now menaces the island's agriculture. The government proposes to reduce the population by using a virus that has caused devastating epidemics in rabbit populations elsewhere. There is, however, a chance that the virus will infect the bilby, an endangered native marsupial. The government's plan, therefore, may serve the interests of agriculture but will clearly increase the threat to native wildlife.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
逻辑:JJ上很全 有一题没做到过是说有种外来的兔子太多了,政府决定用一个东东杀死兔子,这种东东呢又对B有很少的影响。所以政府可以放心地使用这种东东,因为他又控制兔子又不伤害农作物。问假设 答案有说there must be another way to 杀死这种兔子blablabla.... 不好意思忘记了。。求考古,求正解
说有个说法是说一个great的电影呢要开阔人的心胸(我是这么理解的,依稀记得horizontal这个词)。一般让人看了很舒服的电影呢,都没有这个功能,因此只有那些让人看了不舒服的电影才是great的电影。问削弱还是评价啊 C文章忽略了那些让人看了舒服同时又开阔眼界的电影的存在(我觉得貌似还是这个稍稍靠谱一点) D 文章confuses “Great” 的两个意思
40: GWD-29-Q37 Rabbits were introduced to Numa Island in the nineteenth century. Overgrazing by the enormous population of rabbits now menaces the island’s agriculture. The government proposes to reduce the population by using a virus that has caused devastating epidemics in rabbit populations elsewhere. There is, however, a chance that the virus will infect the bilby, an endangered native marsupial. The government’s plan, therefore, may serve the interests of agriculture but will clearly increase the threat to native wildlife. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. There is less chance that the virus will infect domestic animals on Numa than that it will infect bilbies. B. There are no species of animals on the island that prey on the rabbits. C. Overgrazing by rabbits endangers many of the plants on which bilbies feed. D. The virus that the government proposes to use has been successfully used elsewhere to control populations of rabbits. E. There is no alternative means of reducing the rabbit population that would involve no threat to the bilby.
40: GWD-29-Q37 Rabbits were introduced to Numa Island in the nineteenth century. The government proposes to reduce the population by using a virus that has caused devastating epidemics in rabbit populations elsewhere. But the virus will have a liitle(有这个词) infection on the bilby. The government’s plan, therefore, may serve the interests of agriculture.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. There is less chance that the virus will infect domestic animals on Numa than that it will infect bilbies. B. There are no species of animals on the island that prey on the rabbits. C. Overgrazing by rabbits endangers many of the plants on which bilbies feed. D. The virus that the government proposes to use has been successfully used elsewhere to control populations of rabbits. E. There must be some alternative means of reducing the rabbit population that would involve no threat to the bilby.