ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Charcoal from a hearth site in Colorado, 2,000 miles south of Alaska, is known to be 11,200 years old. Researchers reasoned that, since glaciers prevented human migration south from the Alaska-Siberia land bridge between 18,000 and 11,000 years ago, humans must have come to the Americas more than 18,000 years ago.

Which of the following pieces of new evidence would cast doubt on the conclusion drawn above?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1759|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[考古] 而是流洛基够第二十三。。。貌似找到了变体

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-10-26 19:40:21 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Q30: GWD-11-Q41:
Charcoal from a hearth site in Colorado, 2,000 miles south of Alaska, is known to be 11,200 years old.  Researchers reasoned that, since glaciers prevented human migration south from the Alaska-Siberia land bridge between 18,000 and 11,000 years ago, humans must have come to the Americas more than 18,000 years ago.
Which of the following pieces of new evidence would cast doubt on the conclusion drawn above?
A.    Using new radiocarbon dating techniques, it was determined that the charcoal from the Colorado site was at least 11,400 years old.
B.    Another campsite was found in New Mexico with remains dated at 16,000 years old.
C.    A computer simulation of glacial activity showed that it would already have been impossible for humans to travel south overland from Alaska 18,500 years ago.
D.    Using new radiocarbon dating techniques, it was proved that an ice-free corridor allowed passage south from the Alaska-Siberia land bridge at least 11,400 years ago.
E.    Studies of various other hunting-gathering populations showed convincingly that, once the glaciers allowed passage, humans could have migrated from Alaska to Colorado in about 20 years.

OG39. Most archaeologists have held that people first reached the Americas less than 20,000 years ago by crossing a land bridge into North America. But recent discoveries of human shelters in South America dating from 32,000 years ago have led researchers to speculate that people arrived in South America first, after voyaging across the Pacific, and then spread northward.

Which of the following, if it were discovered, would be pertinent evidence against the speculation above?
A. A rock shelter near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, contains evidence of use by human beings 19,000 years ago.
B. Some North American sites of human habitation predate any sites found in South America.
C. The climate is warmer at the 32,000-year-old South American site than at the oldest known North American site.
D. The site in South America that was occupied 32,000 years ago was continuously occupied until 6,000 years ago.
E. The last Ice Age, between 11,500 and 20,000 years ago, considerably lowered worldwide sea levels.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-10-26 19:52:11 | 只看该作者
hahaahahahah
板凳
发表于 2010-10-26 20:00:25 | 只看该作者
。。第二题是选B吗?
地板
发表于 2010-10-26 20:01:17 | 只看该作者
是滴
DB
5#
发表于 2010-10-26 20:11:18 | 只看该作者
这里的some还成了正确答案。是因为这个单词pertinent 吗
6#
发表于 2010-10-26 23:30:12 | 只看该作者
这里的some还成了正确答案。是因为这个单词pertinent 吗
-- by 会员 gongchenglu (2010/10/26 20:11:18)



这个不能生套技巧的啊。。。这个some就是明确的“一些”的意思。。又不是表示程度。。。跟pertinent完全也没关系。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-13 08:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部