og12 sc 87痛哭流涕地跪求解释！！！

athenawujj

终于懂了为什么d逗号要去掉的原因，膜拜一下！！谢谢！！

vianfq

Thanks to all of you guys, I finally got the grammar point of this question! CD is really a great place!

ainiAnnie

这道题其实和og 85 有相似点。
以下摘自 Ron：
if you have a parallel construction involving tensed verbs, and the tensed verb is EXACTLY THE SAME in both (or all, if there are more than 2) parts of the construction, then you may omit the verb in all but the first part.
for instance:
the rain was torrential and the wind fierce.
in this case, we're allowed to omit the second 'was', because it's identical to the 'was' in the first part.

而这道题呢就是一个逆过程，它已经做了省略→动词补充出来就必须 exactly the same.

这句话我们可不可以这么来看，and 暗示一种平行结构。
their wines are priced to sell, and they do （sell）.小M上讲说当代词出现在一个平行结构当中时，第二个句子中的代词趋于指代和第一个句子中地位相同的对象，特别是主语的情况。
在这里是符合的。
they 指的是 their wines，并且前面有分号，这个句子相对独立，they 如果指酒商是不合理的，因为代词指代不能 touch inside.

默默楚

解释的太棒了！！很清楚！谢谢大牛！！

yomukie

27楼解释的太精彩啦！！！！！！！！！！！！完全搞明白了

romeo12345

nightingale 发表于 2011-3-13 15:54
In the rare cases in which the tenses do not need to match,the exact verb form missing afterthe h ...

cong~~~~~~

沐光

非常感谢，学习了~！

heidiym

但是要是they指的wines的话 their wines这个就说不通了吧？

majusakax

hnqxsky 发表于 2010-12-29 12:42
In the rare cases in which the tenses do not need to match,the exact verb form missing afterthe help ...

看到最后一个例句突然醍醐灌顶，搞了好久终于明白了。谢谢谢谢谢谢谢谢！！！！