ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: 719870465
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og12 sc 87痛哭流涕地跪求解释!!!

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2011-4-17 17:29:33 | 只看该作者
这下就比较清楚了。学习了。
32#
发表于 2011-4-17 18:00:48 | 只看该作者
深有同感,好多语法题有时候就靠感觉来着,感觉还总是不准,看正确答案,怎么看怎么对,自己做就彻底懵掉!
33#
发表于 2011-4-17 22:29:40 | 只看该作者
醍醐灌顶呀!
34#
发表于 2011-4-17 22:59:41 | 只看该作者
直接看they do 选c
35#
发表于 2011-4-20 13:18:25 | 只看该作者
这道题当时也没看懂,现在明白了,感谢~
36#
发表于 2011-5-1 16:10:30 | 只看该作者


got it ~~~~~~~~
37#
发表于 2011-5-7 13:30:53 | 只看该作者
恩,清楚了很多,谢谢各位!
38#
发表于 2011-5-7 18:11:25 | 只看该作者
后一个they 指的是酒,如果是人指代上就出错了。而且东西卖可以 被动be sold 或者主动sell,只是意思用法不同,这个就得纠结高中语法了。
39#
发表于 2011-5-14 15:12:39 | 只看该作者
同纠结。。。
40#
发表于 2011-7-5 01:13:30 | 只看该作者
"
Let me explain in detail. We will just concentrate on the second clause that starts with "Their wines...".

"Their wines have been priced to sell, and they do [sell]. " -- This is the right version of the sentence. Parallelism lies on either sides of "and". you say that "Their wines have been priced to sell" on first note. On second, you actually mean to say that "Their wines do sell". When you combine these 2 notes, you get:

"Their wines have been priced to sell and Their wines do sell".

You have 2 repeating words -- "Their wines" and "sell". So, you replace with a pronoun "they" and eliminate second "sell" as it is understandable that it is meant to sell.

Try replacing "are" and "have" in place of "do" in:
"Their wines have been priced to sell and Their wines do sell".

It will not make sense."


我觉得以上这个解释够清楚明白了。
-- by 会员 ourfuture (2010/10/22 14:13:47)

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-3-10 13:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部