Kevin的任务量化日记

vincent0330

大家都流行沉下去啊.....kevin要加油.....

不然斥候.....

kevinwww

刚总结了一道逻辑题

74. Governments have only one response to public criticism of socially necessary services: regulation of the activity of providing those services. But governments inevitably make the activity more expensive by regulating it, and that is particularly troublesome in these times of strained financial resources. However, since public criticism of childcare services has undermined all confidence in such services, and since such services are socially necessary, the government is certain to respond.
Which one of the following statements can be inferred from the passage?
(A) The quality of child-care will improve.
(B) The cost of providing child-care services will increase.
(C) The government will use funding to foster advances in child-care.
(D) If public criticism of policy is strongly voiced, the government is certain to respond.
(E) If child-care services are not regulated, the cost of providing childcare will not increase.

逻辑推理：

由：public criticism+necessary->only One response -> regulation of activity->more expensive->(strained resources)
可以推出：child service necessary-> respond (->regulation->more expensive) -> cost increase 答案B

而得不出以下推理：

respond -> child-care will improve  答案A（即使行动了，目的也不一定能达到）

respond -> regulation of activity-> use funding to foster advances 答案C（只是很多办法中的一种，而且原文未提到）

strongly voiced(criticism) -> respond答案D（缺少necessary的条件，only one response不等于一定要response）

not regulated -> not increase       答案E（由“A-> B”得不出 “非A-> 非B”，如由2+3=5，推不出不是2+3就不等于5）

分析了4个错误选项，可以得出ETS常考察的几个逻辑错误（有利于排除迷惑选项）

1、   结果的多样性：为某一目的而采取的行动，并不一定能达到实现该目的的结果；A

2、   唯一性不等于必然性：对一件事物唯一的反应，不等于必然要这样反应（也可能不反应）C

3、   办法的多样性：由采取行动得不出一定要采取某个特定的行动 D

4、   否命题：由A发生则B发生，得不出A不发生B就一定不发生。（若原命题成立，则逆否命题一定成立，但逆命题和否命题不一定成立。）E

kevinwww

简单的快乐！我喜欢这样的感觉，我只想要简单的快乐

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

明白四个关键问题切入GMAT阅读部分

……做好GMAT阅读，不必如此费力，GMAT阅读的内容都无需知晓，考生所要知道的是四个关键问题：即作者写这篇文章的主要目的(purpose)、作者的态度(attitude)、全文的主要思想(main idea)、文章的结构(structure)。 　　读完全文，知道这些就足够了，这不需要你有任何的背景知识。然后开始做题，凡是涉及到以上几个方面的题，你就都能轻松做对。如果是细节题，依据问题中给出的行号或关键字，到原文中查找即可得答案。

arundhati

以下是引用kevinwww在2004-5-12 22:49:00的发言：

还没定,这4,5天没进展,不知道6.18能不能来得及,不行就26(但怕他换了题库), 这两天突击一下补补进度,然后再订计划!arundhati是前辈了,还请多多指教!

我其实很菜的，指教不敢当，但我们可以经常交流交流嘛～ 加油，反正6月是属于我们的～

雪落无声

kevin 总结好详细哦～看着象NN的样子！

加油！考完G爽爽地打网球去～！

lwei1016

简单的快乐！

考G就是简单的好,心态也不会有什么起落.

看来kevinn是看破了GMAT哦~~~~~~~~~~~

期待kevinn大牛的出现.

我爱宝宝

费费135-63. Some good cooks are gourmet cooks who pride themselves on always using extravagantly rich ingredients in elaborate recipes. Some good cooks can be characterized as fast-food cooks. They may use rich ingredients as long as the recipes are easy to follow and take little time. Other good cooks are health food enthusiasts, who are concerned primarily with the nutritional value of food. But even though not all good cooks are big eaters, they all enjoy preparing and serving food.

If the information in the passage is true, which one of the following CANNOT be true?

(A) Most good cooks do not use extravagantly rich ingredients.

(B) Everyone who enjoys preparing and serving food is a good cook.

(C) More good cooks who use extravagantly rich ingredients are big eaters than are good cooks who do not use such ingredients.

(D) There are fewer good cooks who enjoy serving and preparing food than there are good cooks who are big eaters.

(E) Gourmet cooks, fast-food cooks, and cooks who are health food enthusiasts are all big eaters.

答案是d，可我觉得e对。题干问cannot be true, e与题目中But even though not all good cooks are big eaters相反，不就是答案吗？

为什么答案是d呢？

kevinwww

even though not all 不等于 not all，我觉得这道题就是在考even though，在题目中是个让步（或叫假设）：“即使不都贪吃,也都以此为乐趣” 就是说也可能都贪吃，所以E的说法是对的，不能选。

你觉得选D不对吗?  我觉得D“以此为乐的厨师少于贪吃的厨师”倒是明显的与原文“即使不都贪吃,也都以此为乐趣”即“贪吃的少于与此为乐的”相反，所以可以肯定地选D，因此E即使分不清真伪也不用管它了。

“Some good cooks are gourmet cooks who pride themselves on always using extravagantly rich ingredients in elaborate recipes. Some good cooks can be characterized as fast-food cooks. They may use rich ingredients as long as the recipes are easy to follow and take little time. Other good cooks are health food enthusiasts, who are concerned primarily with the nutritional value of food. ”整个都是废话，知道是说“厨师A，厨师B，厨师C”就行了，具体怎么说得不用管，一般也不会是出题点。

“But even though not all good cooks are big eaters, they all enjoy preparing and serving food. ”看懂这一句就够了(总结句)。

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-14 11:23:53编辑过]

我爱宝宝

以下是引用kevinwww在2004-5-14 10:47:00的发言：

even though not all 不等于 not all，我觉得这道题就是在考even though，在题目中是个让步（或叫假设）：“即使不都贪吃,也都以此为乐趣” 就是说也可能都贪吃，所以E的说法是对的，不能选。

有道理！这个题目排除了我一个逻辑上障碍，感谢ing！即使不是所有的人《》不是所有的人。

你觉得选D不对吗?  我觉得D“以此为乐的厨师少于贪吃的厨师”倒是明显的与原文“即使不都贪吃,也都以此为乐趣”即“贪吃的少于与此为乐的”相反，所以可以肯定地选D，因此E即使分不清真伪也不用管它了。

以此为乐的〉= 贪吃的！

“Some good cooks are gourmet cooks who pride themselves on always using extravagantly rich ingredients in elaborate recipes. Some good cooks can be characterized as fast-food cooks. They may use rich ingredients as long as the recipes are easy to follow and take little time. Other good cooks are health food enthusiasts, who are concerned primarily with the nutritional value of food. ”整个都是废话，知道是说“厨师A，厨师B，厨师C”就行了，具体怎么说得不用管，一般也不会是出题点。

是一般还是100%？如果是一般的话，对于这种conclusion+cannot be是不是风险大了点？有机会再把这种题全部找出来总结一下规律就好了。

“But even though not all good cooks are big eaters, they all enjoy preparing and serving food. ”看懂这一句就够了(总结句)。

这句确实很关键啊，even though not all<> not all

好题！

arundhati

kevin的解释看起来真是出名堂，一个大牛又诞生了！

想问问kevin是怎么总结阅读的？那是我的死穴