- UID
- 107595
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2005-8-17
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
quite frankly, i don't care about if you are able to get your phd within two yrs. and i don't care if you would put too much in it to exhaust yourself. if you are smart enough, maybe you have a chance to get a shot. shit things happen every day in the academia. who knows.
yet i do want to raise the issue about publication. if you intend to end up your phd with no A-level publication at all, then you are clear. but if you have any intent to work out sth and put it into the research field to mark your presence, it is almost definitely impossible to get this done within two yrs. peer review process may kill your time easily. and nobody knows how it ends.
in response to your question, i don't think it would even make an issue here. the career paths for phd and mba/ma are divergent rather than some sort of reaching a marriage status. if you are confident enough, as you have presented in this post, to get a phd in two yrs, then what the hell you would even bother comparing the goods of choosing one out of the other. is money really the issue here? to me, it doesn't sound that it is.
my advice: think about what you wanna do for a living. to do research, or to work full-time in the industry? what do you have in hand as unique competitive advantage that would distinguish you from significant others in the candidate pool? |
|