ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: aeoluseros
打印 上一主题 下一主题

prep2008 -sc 语法笔记勘误、查漏专贴

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2010-9-28 18:50:20 | 只看该作者
For at least two decades or more previous to when the Venetian artist Giovanni Battista Tiepolo died in 1770, he was the most admired painter in Italy.
A.For at least two decades or more previous to when the Venetian artist Giovanni Battista Tiepolo died in 1770, he was
B.For at least two decades before the Venetian artist Giovanni Battista Tiepolo died in 1770, he had been
C.For at least two decades or more before the Venetian artist Giovanni Battista Tiepolo's dying in 1770, he had been
D.When the Venetian artist Giovanni Battista Tiepolo died in 1770, for at least two decades previously he was  
E.When the Venetian artist Giovanni Battista Tiepolo died in 1770, having been for at least two decades before that
D.同A,主句时态错误;一个时间状语分拆为两个的表达非常累赘;at least和or more用词重复
D选项中莫有看到at least 和 or more 的重复出现,应该只有时态的问题
22#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-10-2 10:57:17 | 只看该作者
oh, thanks, antony880805
23#
发表于 2010-10-5 15:26:01 | 只看该作者
看完og 和白勇后, 待我细细研读楼主的巨作.
24#
发表于 2010-10-7 17:57:45 | 只看该作者
prep1-238题中的“倍数表达法”补充说明里面第1小点的twice用法里面最后一句是不是没说完啊?
25#
发表于 2010-10-7 18:36:31 | 只看该作者
在“that , one , it 的区别”中您提到:VII. it与that均可以替代上文全句的内容或部分内容, 而one /ones则不可以。
He has saved my life; I'll never forget it. (it代替第一分句)
我记得og还是哪里说过it不能指代前面一句话的呀。。忘记在哪看到的了。。不好意思
26#
发表于 2010-10-8 10:39:16 | 只看该作者
还有prep2里面的177题
“题目释义:For the farmer….., provided and milked…., Holstein cows will produce…….
For引导介词词组作表语提到句首,整个句子使用到装,provided and milked并列修饰主语Holstein cows。”

这里怎么会是倒装呢?如果for引导介词词组作表语放句首倒装的话,那整句话的系动词在哪??
还有for放句首有倒装么?恕在下孤陋寡闻了。
For the farmer who takes care to keep them cool, providing them with high-energy feed, and milking them regularly, Holstein cows are producing an average of 2,275 gallons of milk each per year.
A.    providing them with high-energy feed, and milking them regularly, Holstein cows are producing
B.    providing them with high-energy feed, and milked regularly, the Holstein cow produces
C.    provided with high-energy feed, and milking them regularly, Holstein cows are producing
D.    provided with high-energy feed, and milked regularly, the Holstein cow produces        
E.    provided with high-energy feed, and milked regularly, Holstein cows will produce
觉得还是cool,provided,milked三者并列更说得通吧,就是keep them cool, keep them provided with, and keep them milked。
班门弄斧一下,谢谢
27#
发表于 2010-10-8 23:37:04 | 只看该作者
08 版PREP语法笔记中,216 题 的A 选项解释我觉得有点问题
216. (T-3-Q39) (天山-7-39)
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.
A.    lants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi,
B.    lants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi,
C.    lants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon,
D.    lants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon,      
E.    lants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi

A.    主系表结构的比较后面的are多余;后面的in the form of carbon dioxide错误的修饰了fungi;converting应当与acquiring平行。

我认为A中,主系表结构的比较后面的are不是一个错误点。正是由于这个are避免了歧义的产生。如果没有这个are, 我们则可以认为是carbon 与 fungi 在做对比。A的错,主要是由于后面的in the form of carbon dioxide错误的修饰了fungi;以及converting应当与acquiring平行。

请各位大牛帮忙看看啊!
28#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-10-14 12:43:20 | 只看该作者
在“that , one , it 的区别”中您提到:VII. it与that均可以替代上文全句的内容或部分内容, 而one /ones则不可以。
He has saved my life; I'll never forget it. (it代替第一分句)
我记得og还是哪里说过it不能指代前面一句话的呀。。忘记在哪看到的了。。不好意思
-- by 会员 ozymendias (2010/10/7 18:36:31)


嗯,对的,要指代前面一句话的核心含义只能用so,那个知识点忘了标出是针对日常语法点了。多谢ozymendias~
29#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-10-14 12:52:27 | 只看该作者
08 版PREP语法笔记中,216 题 的A 选项解释我觉得有点问题
216. (T-3-Q39) (天山-7-39)
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.
A.    lants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi,
B.    lants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi,
C.    lants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon,
D.    lants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon,      
E.    lants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi

A.    主系表结构的比较后面的are多余;后面的in the form of carbon dioxide错误的修饰了fungi;converting应当与acquiring平行。

我认为A中,主系表结构的比较后面的are不是一个错误点。正是由于这个are避免了歧义的产生。如果没有这个are, 我们则可以认为是carbon 与 fungi 在做对比。A的错,主要是由于后面的in the form of carbon dioxide错误的修饰了fungi;以及converting应当与acquiring平行。

请各位大牛帮忙看看啊!
-- by 会员 xueying519 (2010/10/8 23:37:04)


感觉more修饰不到carbon,所以A里面就算are不补出,也没有carbon和fungi对比的歧义。
强烈欢迎进一步讨论!
30#
发表于 2010-10-16 23:08:36 | 只看该作者
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi (at acquiring carbon), .....
能不能看做是对 at acquiring carbon 的省略呢?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-22 23:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部