prep2008 -sc 语法笔记勘误、查漏专贴

Jimmyzhang2012

似乎 题目释义 和 正确答案的 选项分析 有矛盾的地方，个人认为题目释义的讲法更可取。kindly review & revise.  thx!

题目释义：For the farmer who … to keep them cool, providedand milked…., Holstein cows will produce…….
         cool，provided，milked三者并列做keep的宾语的补足语，for the farmers中的for为介词表原因。
选项分析: Correct；调整句子语序:Provided withhigh-energy feed, and miked regularly, Holstein cows will produce an average of2,275 gallons of mild each per year for the farmer who takes care to keep themcool。

balgirl

[讨论] Prep 2 -1 191
For the last five years the Dutch economy has grown faster than Britain, France, or Germany, with the unemployment rate having remained well below that of the other three countries.  
A.    Britain, France, or Germany, with the unemployment rate having remained
B.    have those of Britain, France, or Germany, and the unemployment rate remaining
C.    have Britain, France, and Germany, and the unemployment rate has remained
D.    the economy of Britain, France, and Germany, with the unemployment rate that has remained
E.    the economies of Britain, France, and Germany, and the unemployment rate has remained

关于D选项的解释为：
(D) with的逻辑主语是Dutch economy，错误。

我觉得这里D的用法为做同位语 “with + n. + that” ，而并非做独立主格的用法“with + 宾语 + 宾补”
这样，当with结构做同位语的时候，应该是就近修饰最接近的名词，也就是 the economy of Britain, France, and Germany，而不存在逻辑主语的概念
但是根据句意逻辑上，这个with的内容应该修饰的是Dutch economy，所以错误

不知道我的理解是否正确，请斑竹指教！

谢谢！

hermione0527

版主，语法笔记中讲到同位语时说，同位结构中名词的数可以和其修饰对象的数不一致。
OG12 30题
For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti
nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden
frames were essential items of military equipment,
a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows
and spears.
(A) a method to protect
(B) as a method protecting
(C) protecting
(D) as a protection of
(E) to protect

对A选项的解释是A method to protect is awkward and inaccurate in reference to items。我知道这里A错是因为说items是个method逻辑错误，但items和a method数不一致这个对吗？不知笔记中所讲“同位结构中名词的数可以和其修饰对象的数不一致”是否是这种情况，可以举几个例子吗？谢谢~

ppher

Prep-1-173

The widely accepted big-bang theory holds that the universe began in an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago and has been expanding ever since.
A. that the universe began in an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago and has been expanding
B. that the universe had begun in an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago and had been expanding
C. that the beginning of the universe was an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago that has expanded
D. the beginning of the universe to have been an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago that is expanding  
E. the universe to have begun in an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago and has been expanding

选项分析之C，”was应该改为is”，是因为that从句时态为现在时吗？(暂先不论其它错误)
“ago”搭配过去时”was”正确啊？改为”is”之理由为? 请LZ解惑，谢谢!

aeoluseros

似乎 题目释义 和 正确答案的 选项分析 有矛盾的地方，个人认为题目释义的讲法更可取。kindly review & revise.  thx!

题目释义：For the farmer who … to keep them cool, providedand milked…., Holstein cows will produce…….
cool，provided，milked三者并列做keep的宾语的补足语，for the farmers中的for为介词表原因。
选项分析: Correct；调整句子语序:Provided withhigh-energy feed, and miked regularly, Holstein cows will produce an average of2,275 gallons of mild each per year for the farmer who takes care to keep themcool。

-- by 会员 Jimmyzhang2012 (2011/5/18 21:54:17)

对，已修正，谢谢jimmy

aeoluseros

[讨论] Prep 2 -1 191
For the last five years the Dutch economy has grown faster than Britain, France, or Germany, with the unemployment rate having remained well below that of the other three countries.  
A.    Britain, France, or Germany, with the unemployment rate having remained
B.    have those of Britain, France, or Germany, and the unemployment rate remaining
C.    have Britain, France, and Germany, and the unemployment rate has remained
D.    the economy of Britain, France, and Germany, with the unemployment rate that has remained
E.    the economies of Britain, France, and Germany, and the unemployment rate has remained

关于D选项的解释为：
(D) with的逻辑主语是Dutch economy，错误。

我觉得这里D的用法为做同位语 “with + n. + that” ，而并非做独立主格的用法“with + 宾语 + 宾补”
这样，当with结构做同位语的时候，应该是就近修饰最接近的名词，也就是 the economy of Britain, France, and Germany，而不存在逻辑主语的概念
但是根据句意逻辑上，这个with的内容应该修饰的是Dutch economy，所以错误

不知道我的理解是否正确，请斑竹指教！

谢谢！

-- by 会员 balgirl (2011/5/19 23:42:58)

umm...with结构不能做同位语。

aeoluseros

版主，语法笔记中讲到同位语时说，同位结构中名词的数可以和其修饰对象的数不一致。
OG12 30题
For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti
nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden
frames were essential items of military equipment,
a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows
and spears.
(A) a method to protect
(B) as a method protecting
(C) protecting
(D) as a protection of
(E) to protect

对A选项的解释是A method to protect is awkward and inaccurate in reference to items。我知道这里A错是因为说items是个method逻辑错误，但items和a method数不一致这个对吗？不知笔记中所讲“同位结构中名词的数可以和其修饰对象的数不一致”是否是这种情况，可以举几个例子吗？谢谢~

-- by 会员 hermione0527 (2011/5/20 13:22:14)

同位语只是一个概括，用单数名词来表达一堆事物的共性并没有问题，比如each型同位语就是很典型的同位语与其修饰对象的数不一致。

ps: hermione有些进入误区. 一定要记得从逻辑入手，从GMAT根本纲领“表意清晰，结构简洁，语义单一而精准”入手，不可以记语法点为核心，要不然看笔记反而是适得其反了.

aeoluseros

Prep-1-173

The widely accepted big-bang theory holds that the universe began in an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago and has been expanding ever since.
A. that the universe began in an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago and has been expanding
B. that the universe had begun in an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago and had been expanding
C. that the beginning of the universe was an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago that has expanded
D. the beginning of the universe to have been an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago that is expanding  
E. the universe to have begun in an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago and has been expanding

选项分析之C，”was应该改为is”，是因为that从句时态为现在时吗？(暂先不论其它错误)
“ago”搭配过去时”was”正确啊？改为”is”之理由为? 请LZ解惑，谢谢!

-- by 会员 ppher (2011/5/21 17:04:30)

that the beginning of the universe is an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago
因为这是一个客观真理：宇宙的初始是一个10 to 20 billion年前的爆炸瞬间。所以应该是一般现在时。
而如果是宇宙是从10 to 20 billion年前爆炸瞬间开始的。那么就应该用一般过去时。
其实还有一个错误是10 to 20 billion years ago不知道是修饰instant还是修饰the beginning of the universe is an explosive instant.

ppher

Prep-1-173

The widely accepted big-bang theory holds that the universe began in an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago and has been expanding ever since.
A. that the universe began in an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago and has been expanding
B. that the universe had begun in an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago and had been expanding
C. that the beginning of the universe was an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago that has expanded
D. the beginning of the universe to have been an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago that is expanding  
E. the universe to have begun in an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago and has been expanding

选项分析之C，”was应该改为is”，是因为that从句时态为现在时吗？(暂先不论其它错误)
“ago”搭配过去时”was”正确啊？改为”is”之理由为? 请LZ解惑，谢谢!

-- by 会员 ppher (2011/5/21 17:04:30)

that the beginning of the universe is an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago
因为这是一个客观真理：宇宙的初始是一个10 to 20 billion年前的爆炸瞬间。所以应该是一般现在时。
而如果是宇宙是从10 to 20 billion年前爆炸瞬间开始的。那么就应该用一般过去时。
其实还有一个错误是10 to 20 billion years ago不知道是修饰instant还是修饰the beginning of the universe is an explosive instant.

-- by 会员 aeoluseros (2011/5/21 17:20:35)

清晰明了!
” ……the universe began in an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago…… ”与”the beginning of the universe is an explosive instant 10 to 20 billion years ago”涵义有差，故时态不同。

领会了~谢谢!

陌渊

OG-171下的补充说明，关于so as to连写，最后一句话，如果to do 做状语，修饰的最近的谓语动词。这句话很不明白，之后给出的参考例题2中，按笔者的意思是to constitute是修饰的features，我被弄糊涂了