prep2008 -sc 语法笔记勘误、查漏专贴

aeoluseros

188
夸克的语法大全里面明确写出having done做限定性修饰是错误的：
The perfective aspect cannot usually be expressed in the nonfinite clause:

i think it should be "....in the finite clause"

-- by 会员 jaze (2011/4/19 16:29:29)

嗯，粗心，是finite clause，多谢jaze！

aeoluseros

2-204

Require of sb. to do （应该加that，只有required of sb.才是加to do的）

I think it should be this:
只有required sb 才是加to do的

-- by 会员 jaze (2011/4/25 22:27:59)

嗯，当初其实是为了和前面的require of做对比后面才写required of的。
已更进为：
require of sb.后应该加that，只有require sb.和sth. is required of sb.后面才是加to do的

aeoluseros

227. (GWD-7-Q3)
The state has proposed new rules that would set minimum staffing levels for nurses, rules intended to ensure that at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room.
A.    rules intended to ensure that at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room
B.    rules with the intent of ensuring one nurse at least to be assigned for every four patients to be put through triage in a hospital emergency room
C.    rules intending to ensure at least one nurse is assigned for every four patients in a hospital emergency room put through triage
D.    with the intent of ensuring that at least one nurse should be assigned for every four patients in a hospital emergency room that are put through triage        
E.    and this is intended to ensure one nurse at least to be assigned for every four patients put through triage in a hospital emergency room

B解释中的原因有with the intent to do sth. 固定搭配；见曼哈顿4TH，P157，也有with the intent of doing，所以感觉不能作为排除根据。。。。。

-- by 会员 毛毛的臭脚丫 (2011/4/24 5:38:59)

great point! B解释错了，一直没看出来，多谢毛毛的臭脚丫。
不能用with the intent to do的，只能用with intent to do或者with the intert of doing.

jaze

2-218

2.    “A variety of + 复数名词”后面谓语用复数形式；“a body of/a collection of/an arrary of/a series of/a set of/a portion of/a group of/ a constellation of/a team of + 复数名词”作主语后面谓语都用单数形式，因为后面是of引导的介宾短语做形容词。

总感觉这个说的前后逻辑不对啊， 到底单数还是复数？ 难道 A variety of + 复数名词   跟
a body of + 复数名词  不是同一类？

jaze

247. (GWD-3-Q39)Minivanscarry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utilityvehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily,and have a smoother ride.
A.    Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and,compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,
B.    Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with mostsport utility vehicles, they cost less,
C.    Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, in comparison with mostsport utility vehicles, and have a lower cost, they
D.     Minivans, carrying asmany as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, costless,   (A)
E.    Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with mostsport utility vehicles the cost is lower, and they





类似例题链接1：prep1-247, GWD-3-Q39
Minivanscarry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utilityvehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, and make it easy for passengers to get in andout, and have a smoother, more car-like ride.
这个题和前面的不一样， 也错了， make 前面不应该有and啊

aeoluseros

2-218

2.    “A variety of + 复数名词”后面谓语用复数形式；“a body of/a collection of/an arrary of/a series of/a set of/a portion of/a group of/ a constellation of/a team of + 复数名词”作主语后面谓语都用单数形式，因为后面是of引导的介宾短语做形容词。

总感觉这个说的前后逻辑不对啊， 到底单数还是复数？ 难道 A variety of + 复数名词   跟
a body of + 复数名词  不是同一类？

-- by 会员 jaze (2011/4/26 14:32:42)

嗯，从以前的题目看来GMAT认为他们不是同一类的.
http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-variety-of-singular-or-plural-107348.html
GMAT更认为a variety of是adj.，而body, collection这些认为是collective noun.

aeoluseros

247. (GWD-3-Q39)Minivanscarry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utilityvehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily,and have a smoother ride.
A.Minivans carry as many as seven passengers and,compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less,
B.Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with mostsport utility vehicles, they cost less,
C.Minivans carry as many as seven passengers, in comparison with mostsport utility vehicles, and have a lower cost, they
D.Minivans, carrying asmany as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, costless,   (A)
E.Minivans, which carry as many as seven passengers, compared with mostsport utility vehicles the cost is lower, and they





类似例题链接1：prep1-247, GWD-3-Q39
Minivanscarry as many as seven passengers and, compared with most sport utilityvehicles, cost less, get better gas mileage, and make it easy for passengers to get in andout, and have a smoother, more car-like ride.
这个题和前面的不一样， 也错了， make 前面不应该有and啊

-- by 会员 jaze (2011/4/27 8:58:38)

不错~这个还真疏忽了，一眼望去看不出来. 感谢jaze看得细致！

hermione0527

Prep1-192中C的解释说冒号后面要用完整的句子。这个好像不对，Manhattan SC第十章讲冒号的时候有提到，冒号前必须是完整的句子，但后面就不一定。比如：I love listening to many kinds of music: classical, rock,and pop.

aeoluseros

Prep1-192中C的解释说冒号后面要用完整的句子。这个好像不对，Manhattan SC第十章讲冒号的时候有提到，冒号前必须是完整的句子，但后面就不一定。比如：I love listening to many kinds of music: classical, rock,and pop.

-- by 会员 hermione0527 (2011/5/4 15:42:19)

嗯，说得对~谢谢hermione！

jaze

1-188

V-ing结构在句子中可以做定语，状语。
1)   放在句子末尾时，如果前面是主谓宾结构，如果同时时态上与主句搭配合理，V-ing结构作状语，作为：
 伴随动作，表与主句动词同时发生的动作
 伴随结果，表主句动作带来的结果。
此时注意其逻辑主语的判断：其所修饰分句的动作发出者。
2)   放在句子末尾时，如果前面是主谓宾结构，如果同时时态上与主句搭配不合理(如本题D,E选项)，V-ing结构作定语修饰前面名词。
3)   如果前面是主系表结构，由于系动词是一个状态不存在“被伴随”，但是V-ing结构依然修饰的是整个主系表结构，所以后面的V-ing结构也可以被解读为修饰前面的名词成分—主语（如果宾语是名词，也一同修饰，因为主系表结构中主语和宾语所指是同一事物--见OG10-39, OG11-24中对正确选项C的解释）。
4)    现在分词在句尾用逗号隔开，必须要注意的一点是这个结构从来都没有失去过“做定语”的功能，只是优先做状语而已，即优先修饰到前面主句的主语和谓语。如下题如果前面主句的谓语是完成时态，那么既然已经完成了，drawing就无法再做其的伴随，所以只剩下做定语的功能。


前三点讲的是不加逗号 放到句子末尾的情况吗？ 还是只要是句子末尾，加不加逗号都等同一视呢？
看到第四点在说句尾用逗号隔开， 我认为前面讲的是没有逗号的， 但是第二点举的例子
E选项放到句子后事这样的
E.    Neuroscientists have amassed, over the past twenty years, a wealth ofknowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,now drawing solidconclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.
也就是说第二点在描述 加逗号的情况？
感觉第四点和前几点的分类关系  不清楚， 是没有交集？  即前面都是无逗号的，第四点是讲有逗号的
还是，第四点是前面讲的一个小例子， 只是想强调一下，因为从第四点的语气好像是想强调哈