ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: mathjj2009
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[落基] 捌月贰十一日起,落基 北京0831 2225更新 共陆拾题 密码问题不回答

[精华] [复制链接]
51#
发表于 2010-8-24 17:48:34 | 只看该作者
In the late 1980’s, the population of sea otters in the North Pacific Ocean began to decline. Of the two plausible explanations for the decline—increased predation by killer whales or disease—disease is the more likely. After all, a concurrent sharp decline in the populations of seals and sea lions was almost certainly caused by a pollution-related disease, which could have spread to sea otters, whereas the population of killer whales did not change noticeably.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the reasoning? Q50 V34 690 sasazan
A(correct). Killer whales in the North Pacific usually prey on seals and sea lions but will, when this food source is scarce, seek out other prey. 是killer whale造成SO数量减少。
B. There is no indication that substantial numbers of sea otters migrated to other locations from the North Pacific in the 1980’s.假设
C. Along the Pacific coast of North America in the 1980’s, sea otters were absent from many locations where they had been relatively common in former times. 证明事实正确
D. Following the decline in the population of the sea otters, there was an increase in the population of sea urchins, which are sea otters’ main food source. 无关
E. The North Pacific populations of seals and sea lions cover a wider geographic area than does the population of sea otters.[A]无关
52#
发表于 2010-8-24 17:49:45 | 只看该作者
6.狗粮传奇 应该是解释题吧

23.城市的树的说法很牵强啊

24.店铺选址 既然convenient和high-traffic两个条件否定了一个convenient,那就应该跟traffic有关吧

26题与2重复
53#
发表于 2010-8-24 17:57:01 | 只看该作者
第2道和第26题很类似啊~
54#
发表于 2010-8-24 18:26:07 | 只看该作者
谢了
55#
发表于 2010-8-24 20:32:27 | 只看该作者
谢了
56#
发表于 2010-8-24 20:41:18 | 只看该作者
感谢楼主,密码真有趣
57#
发表于 2010-8-24 20:49:02 | 只看该作者
我也是26号考……没怎么复习,没想能上700+,这高分的还真是……希望能托大家的福吧
58#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-24 21:28:39 | 只看该作者
以上都收到 我~~去学校 晚点更新 大家见谅~~
59#
发表于 2010-8-24 21:57:25 | 只看该作者
楼主看看11题犯罪率是不是这题

The violent crime rate (number of violent crimes per 1,000 residents) in Meadowbrook is 60 percent higher now than it was four years ago. The corresponding increase for Parkdale is only 10 percent. These figures support the conclusion that residents of Meadowbrook are more likely to become victims of violent crime than are residents of Parkdale.

The argument above is flawed because it fails to take into account

A.    Changes in the population density of both Meadowbrook and Parkdale over the past four years.
B.    How the rate of population growth in Meadowbrook over the past four years compares to the corresponding rate for Parkdale
C.    The ratio of violent to nonviolent crimes committed during the past four years in Meadowbrook and Parkdale
D.    The violent crime rates in Meadowbrook and Parkdale four years ago
E.    How Meadowbrooks’ expenditures for crime prevention over the past four years compare to Parkdale’s expenditures.
60#
发表于 2010-8-24 21:59:07 | 只看该作者
楼主辛苦了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 02:01
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部