我觉得应该选A,理由如下:
MEL的结论是“The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best Candidates to the job.”,我觉得这里的关键在于too low to "attract" the best candidates.这里面强调的是“candidates”—those who have not been judges yet, 他们都还不是法官—they are potential members, 我认为这一点是题目的关键所在。
Pat’s response is "Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect.",这个回应里的关键是“few judges", 也就是说这些人是“在职法官”—current members。可是,mel说的明明是candidates,pat 用 judges 的情况来回应,当然就是“attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members”,也就是选项A的论述。
个人观点,班门弄斧,请牛人指正。
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-4-18 20:24:23编辑过] |