ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city. There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving. The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3735|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

旧PREP-20。。。

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-27 19:34:20 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
For years the beautiful Renaissance buildings in Palitito have been damaged by exhaust from the many tour buses that come to the city.There has been little parking space, so most buses have idled at the curb during each stop on their tour, and idling produces as much exhaust as driving.The city has now provided parking that accommodates a third of the tour buses, so damage to Palitito's buildings from the buses' exhaust will diminish significantly.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument?

(A) The exhaust from Palitito's few automobiles is not a significant threat to Palitito's buildings.(排除)
(B) Palitito's Renaissance buildings are not threatened by pollution other than engine exhaust.排除
(C) Tour buses typically spend less than one-quarter of the time they are in Palitito transporting passengers from one site to another.
(D) More tourists come to Palitito by tour bus than by any other single means of transportation.
(E) Some of the tour buses that are unable to find parking drive around Palitito while their passengers are visiting a site.

我糊涂了糊涂了糊涂了
本来:停车位少,车子idle,污染
措施:加parking lot
结果:减少污染

我怎么看了C又奇怪呢?
不花在transporting上,还可以做很多事嘛,停车,开到别的城市。

D呢?因为更多人坐tour bus过来了,所以本来要更坏污染环境的,现在有了措施,污染少了。不对么?


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-5-27 21:45:47 | 只看该作者
C说他们原来如果不闲逛的话在P城开的时间是很少的。所以如果有地方停了,不闲逛了,可以减少大于3/4时间的被废弃污染量
D说的是原来人美是自己开车去的。有了parking lot为什么可以推出他们不开车坐公车了?。。。本身这个选项是无关项。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-27 22:19:55 | 只看该作者
谢谢,我懂了!
地板
发表于 2010-7-15 08:25:54 | 只看该作者
C说他们原来如果不闲逛的话在P城开的时间是很少的。所以如果有地方停了,不闲逛了,可以减少大于3/4时间的被废弃污染量
D说的是原来人美是自己开车去的。有了parking lot为什么可以推出他们不开车坐公车了?。。。本身这个选项是无关项。
-- by 会员 bonnie0715 (2010/5/27 21:45:47)




我还是不明白,可不可以请你再给解释一下C选项啊?
5#
发表于 2012-9-2 15:35:06 | 只看该作者
嘿嘿懂啦~^^
6#
发表于 2012-9-7 00:44:05 | 只看该作者
终于懂了。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 11:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部