ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In Rubaria, excellent health care is available to virtually the entire population, whereas very few people in Terland receive adequate medical care. Yet, although the death rate for most diseases is higher in Terland than in Rubaria, the percentage of the male population that dies from prostate cancer is significantly higher in Rubaria than in Terland.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the disparity between the prostate cancer death rate in Rubaria and Terland?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 14301|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教GWD中的一逻辑题...

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-15 03:28:00 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
有人能帮我解释一下为什么选B吗? 理由是什么呢?   扣谢拉哦
考古
: TTGWD11-Q19from忽然MM
In Rubaria, excellent health care is available to virtually the entire population, whereas very few people in Terland receive adequate medical care. Yet, although the death rate for most diseases is higher in Terland than in Rubaria, the percentage of the male population that dies from prostate cancer is significantly higher in Rubaria than in Terland.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the disparity between the prostate cancer death rate in Rubaria and Terland?

A. Effective treatment of prostate cancer in its early stages generally requires medical techniques available in Rubaria but not in Terland.

B. Most men who have prostate cancer are older than the average life expectancy for male inhabitants of Terland.

C. Being in poor general health does not increase one’s risk of developing prostate cancer.

D. It is possible to decrease one’s risk of getting prostate cancer by eating certain kinds of foods, and such foods are more readily available in Rubaria than in Terland.

E. Among men in Rubaria, the death rate from prostate cancer is significantly higher for those who do not take full advantage of Rubaria’s health care system than for those who do.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-7-16 19:13:16 | 只看该作者
依我之见,b的意思是大部分得这个病的男性的年龄比T的平均寿命还要大,也就是说T的男性大部分还没活到得这个病的年龄就被别的病先整死了,所以能解释为什么这个病的死亡率R要比T高
板凳
发表于 2010-7-16 19:33:22 | 只看该作者
楼上有些道理,我觉得其实说穿了T国的人 在得cancer的时候已经都是微微颤颤的百岁老人  他们更可能是自然去世,而不是 that dies from prostate cancer
地板
发表于 2010-7-16 23:07:00 | 只看该作者
就是要解决 死的人多 而 死于这个病的人少 这个矛盾嘛
读起来也就B跟这个矛盾有关系
B就是说的这个病的人都是活得比较久的,大量的人还没到的这个病就先死了,很好的解决了文章的矛盾嘛~~
5#
发表于 2010-8-6 23:53:44 | 只看该作者
D呢~我觉得D也可以吖~
6#
发表于 2010-8-7 00:44:07 | 只看该作者
In Rubaria, excellent health care is available to virtually the entire population, whereas very few people in Terland receive adequate medical care. Yet, although the death rate for most diseases is higher in Terland than in Rubaria, the percentage of the male population that dies from prostate cancer is significantly higher in Rubaria than in Terland.

原文:R比T的医疗条件好,T大多数病的人死的快,但是仅仅PC的男的死的在R 比例高

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the disparity between the prostate cancer death rate in Rubaria and Terland?
问支持!

A. Effective treatment of prostate cancer in its early stages generally requires medical techniques available in Rubaria but not in Terland.

只有R有而T没有的医疗技术,明显是驳斥


B. Most men who have prostate cancer are older than the average life expectancy for male inhabitants of Terland.
活得长不长和原文的死亡率有关,保留


C. Being in poor general health does not increase one’s risk of developing prostate cancer.

poor general health 更换原文出题点,原文说的是H-CARE比较的情况,没说过差的H-的情况,该情况不可知,无关。

D. It is possible to decrease one’s risk of getting prostate cancer by eating certain kinds of foods, and such foods are more readily available in Rubaria than in Terland.

吃不吃某个在R有在T没有的东西会减少生PC的概率,是驳斥原文

E. Among men in Rubaria, the death rate from prostate cancer is significantly higher for those who do not take full advantage of Rubaria’s health care system than for those who do.

在R的2类人比,范围错
7#
发表于 2011-4-8 10:21:08 | 只看该作者
有没有人觉得这个题不太好的,因为我总觉得和average life expetancy的比较不太能说明问题……
8#
发表于 2011-4-8 11:10:29 | 只看该作者
2楼解释的很对啊

为啥T国医疗水平不如R国,而且大多数的疾病,T国的死亡率都高于R国, 而单单是死于prostate cancer的男公民比例,T国反而远远低于R国,这是为啥呀? B解释:因为要得prostate cancer,你至少得活到一定的年纪才有资格得这个病。。。T国人民医疗水平太低啦,平均年龄太低啦,大多数爷们都没活到这个年纪,所以得这个病的几率反而比健康之国R国还低 -----B是很好的解释
9#
发表于 2011-4-8 17:34:26 | 只看该作者
要得到支持r的男人死亡率比t高的原因,

A. Effective treatment of prostate cancer in its early stages generally requires medical techniques available in Rubaria but not in Terland.
r的医疗水平比t高,不能支持结论。
B. Most men who have prostate cancer are older than the average life expectancy for male inhabitants of Terland.
r的病人都是老人,可能会自然死亡这个不是医疗水平可以控制的,所以这个结论都驳斥了背景资料给出的r的医疗比t健全。支持。
C. Being in poor general health does not increase one’s risk of developing prostate cancer.
题目比较t和r的情况,这里没有提,无关。
D. It is possible to decrease one’s risk of getting prostate cancer by eating certain kinds of foods, and such foods are more readily available in Rubaria than in Terland.
某食物会减少得此病的可能,这食物在r比较常见。成为结论的反向支持。同A。错
E. Among men in Rubaria, the death rate from prostate cancer is significantly higher for those who do not take full advantage of Rubaria’s health care system than for those who do.
只说明了MAN 在r地的情况。没有提到T。无关。
10#
发表于 2011-10-7 19:15:29 | 只看该作者
2楼解释的很对啊

为啥T国医疗水平不如R国,而且大多数的疾病,T国的死亡率都高于R国, 而单单是死于prostate cancer的男公民比例,T国反而远远低于R国,这是为啥呀? B解释:因为要得prostate cancer,你至少得活到一定的年纪才有资格得这个病。。。T国人民医疗水平太低啦,平均年龄太低啦,大多数爷们都没活到这个年纪,所以得这个病的几率反而比健康之国R国还低 -----B是很好的解释
-- by 会员 Kb24 (2011/4/8 11:10:29)

 顶这个niub的解释!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-23 01:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部