ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that

正确答案: C

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3455|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PREP RC2 17 看了讨论还是看不明白

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-8 12:30:21 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
17.(26864-!-item-!-188;#058&003368)







At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables.However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood



, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities.Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables.Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.




The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that







(A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood



to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available
(B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood



compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals
(C) a customer of the Hollywood



who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
(D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer



(E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood



's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables

先问一下,这个题目是什么意思啊,究竟是假设,还是削弱啊
选C就应该是个削弱,可是也有很多人都说这个题目是个假设题
希望有人能解释下
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2010-5-8 14:55:28 | 只看该作者

答案是D吧

题目说客户坐高的凳子待得时间比低的时间长  假设是说要是把低的全部换成高的就推出能提高利润 题目中已经有一个条件就是 坐高的比低的时间长  D选择是说坐高凳子是待得时间长同时消费会多一些 只有这样才能推出全换成高的能提高利润
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-8 15:23:14 | 只看该作者
哈哈 ls同学 我们同命相怜啊 正确选项是C
地板
发表于 2010-5-8 15:48:59 | 只看该作者
哦?解释一下
5#
发表于 2010-5-8 18:36:25 | 只看该作者
原文主要谈凳子高矮的问题。。所以D说的是 时间长短的问题 不对头。。
答案应该是C。。。
6#
发表于 2010-5-8 19:11:27 | 只看该作者
题目问的是“The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that”,这个A是错误的,因为他让人们误以为.....,其实就是假设题啊。C是假设啊。他假设坐长凳子就不逗留了。
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-8 21:41:29 | 只看该作者
看了很多的解释发现下面这个比较有说服力
首先认为本题是削弱
C:认为H的顾客对于总体来说是个特例,也就是他们并不是做的时间短,而是做的时间长,因此降低了收益
8#
发表于 2010-5-9 14:21:38 | 只看该作者
我也纠结这道题中,不过看了楼上的回答明白了···
题目的逻辑线:
high tables and stools----->  stay short time  ----->   profits would increase  
C中断了
high tables and stools---\-->  stay short time
说的是high tables and stools----->  stay longer lingering
9#
发表于 2010-5-9 15:01:16 | 只看该作者
豁然开朗!!!谢谢各位了!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-30 03:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部