At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables. However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities. Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables. Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that
At present the Hollywood Restaurant has only standard-height tables.However, many customers come to watch the celebrities who frequent the Hollywood
, and they would prefer tall tables with stools because such seating would afford a better view of the celebrities.Moreover, diners seated on stools typically do not stay as long as diners seated at standard-height tables.Therefore, if the Hollywood replaced some of its seating with high tables and stools, its profits would increase.
The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that
(A) some celebrities come to the Hollywood
to be seen, and so might choose to sit at the tall tables if they were available
(B) the price of meals ordered by celebrities dining at the Hollywood
compensates for the longer time, if any, they spend lingering over their meals
(C) a customer of the Hollywood
who would choose to sit at a tall table would be an exception to the generalization about lingering
(D) a restaurant's customers who spend less time at their meals typically order less expensive meals than those who remain at their meals longer
(E) with enough tall tables to accommodate all the Hollywood
's customers interested in such seating, there would be no view except of other tall tables
题目问的是“The argument is vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it gives reason to believe that it is likely that”,这个A是错误的,因为他让人们误以为.....,其实就是假设题啊。C是假设啊。他假设坐长凳子就不逗留了。
我也纠结这道题中,不过看了楼上的回答明白了··· 题目的逻辑线: high tables and stools-----> stay short time -----> profits would increase C中断了 high tables and stools---\--> stay short time 说的是high tables and stools-----> stay longer lingering